Are You Glad Georgia is No. 1? Cale Conley Thinks You Should Be
Longtime Dawg Sports readers doubtless have noted that I periodically cite Cale Conley’s War Between the States, which chronicles the Georgia-Florida rivalry from its inception in 1904. (Yes, Gator fans, 1904, not 1915.) Cale, with whom I went to law school, is working on an update of the book (now that he will be able to give it a happy ending), and that immersion in the glorious past of Bulldog football has him, like the rest of us (only more so), geared up for the 2008 season.
Below are Cale’s initial thoughts on the Red and Black’s newly-minted No. 1 ranking. Further reflections and ruminations of his may, and updates on the second edition of War Between the States will, appear in this space in the future. For now, though, I give the floor to Cale:
BE NOT AFRAID, BULLDOGS:
NUMBER ONE IS A GOOD THING
By Cale Conley
© 2008
It’s a stat that makes you shake your head: until last week, the Georgia Bulldogs had never been ranked # 1 in any major preseason poll. Not in 1981 as defending national champs, not in 1982 with Herschel back for his Heisman, not ever. Trivia geek alert: the closest the Bulldogs have come was in 1942, when there was no preseason poll but Sinkwich & Trippi’s Dogs were # 2 in the first AP poll of the year.
Since the release of last week’s USA Today Coaches poll putting the Dogs up top, there is of course buzz in the Bulldog Nation, but also a real undercurrent of unease, in fact concern. "It puts too much pressure on us," I’ve heard uttered. "Now we’ve got a target on our back," say others. "Only 2 of the last 10 preseason No. 1’s have won it all," say the aforementioned trivia geeks, who just last year were telling 2007 preseason chart-topper LSU that only 1 of the last 9 teams that started # 1 also finished # 1. LSU, for the uninitiated, is now the defending champion. Score one for the Cajuns.
I’m no Dr. Phil, but I am here to help you cope with being at the preseason pinnacle.
In LSU’s journey of last year lies the explanation why no Bulldog, anywhere, should despair or wish for anything different than the preseason # 1 ranking if, in fact, it is a national title that we want. The reason is simple, but not one many in DawgWorld wish to speak aloud:
Like loaded LSU a year ago, THE 2008 DOGS ARE NOT GOING TO GO UNDEFEATED.
Repeat it with me no matter how much it may pain you, oh sergeant at arms of the Dacula Optimist Club and keeper of the eternal 1980 memorial flame:
THE 2008 DOGS ARE NOT GOING TO GO UNDEFEATED.
If you really think they can, God bless you. I mean really, God bless you. And if they do, at least two things will be clear: (1) it won’t matter what or where we were ranked in the preseason because we had the greatest team since probably Nebraska in 1995 and the talent just took over and we were destined to win it all from the start, like Presbyterians, and (2) my mojo hex of declaring something so vociferously as impossible that it actually comes true has actually worked (and by the way, I am currently Presbyterian, and pray for an undefeated season). But I digress.
The Dogs really won’t go undefeated as bad as we all want to channel 1980 again only because the schedule just won’t let us. Everybody is talking about our "tough schedule" from Lee Corso to the ladies on "The View" (I made that part up), but I haven’t seen any historical research or real data about just how tough it is. For kicks and giggles, I actually did some research, compiled what some may call "data." But first, an observation.
The SEC is loaded top to bottom, but let’s face it, in the modern era, there are six Hall’s (Georgia, Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Tennessee, LSU) and six Oates’ (Ole Miss, Miss State, Kentucky, Vandy and the two teams I’m still not 100% sure are conference members, Arkansas and South Carolina. Could we possibly trade them for Clemson and Texas? Can you imagine? But again I digress.)
Since 1990, only two members of the SEC elite have played and beaten all five of the other members of the conference’s elite in the same year. One was Tennessee, in ’98, which goes down as one of those "Presbyterian-team-of-destiny-wouldn’t-be-denied" kind of things like I was talking about before could happen this year, but won’t (by the way, the Vols’ closest call came at Syracuse, in week one, where they squeaked by 34-33). The other team was Florida, in 1991, in Spurrier’s second year -- before Fulmer and Krispy Kreme kicked in to make Tennessee a power, while pre-Zaxby’s Goff was at our helm, while LSU was suffering from a bad case of Curley Hallman (remember that guy?), and while Pat Dye was still running the power-I at Auburn, just without Bo Jackson or Brent Fullwood. That Gator team swept the then-watered-down other elite and went undefeated in the SEC mainly because Spurrier was offensively about 10 years ahead of his time and had speed before speed was cool, but even that squad did not go undefeated, even in the regular season. Why? Because facing all that other SEC mess, they went on the road, in week three in a hostile out of conference environment (Syracuse), and got bushwhacked pretty badly, 38-21.
Anybody jumping ahead here?
Like the 1991 Gators, the 2008 Dogs face all five of the other elite, including LSU and Auburn on the road. Unlike 1991, all five of those teams are or will be in the top 20 and have actual head coaches. Plus the ’08 Dogs have Spurrier on the road at his new digs in Columbia in a classic trip up game, like every South Carolina meeting, then a flight to the desert to play a ranked out of conference team (Arizona State) in, you guessed it, week three, a la Syracuse and the Gators in 1991 and sorta-kinda-like Tennessee in ‘98. There are no Mississippis, no Arkansas, and even Kentucky and Vandy have improved and can no longer be overlooked. And then there’s a season ending meeting with a Tech team with a new gimmick offense, likely nothing else to lose at that point, and the law of averages on its side (Georgia has never beaten Tech 8 straight times, and the current win streak is at seven. Get out your slide rule! Yikes!).
But wait, there’s more. Go through that gulag and the SEC Championship awaits, where even if we beat them all the first time we’d have to re-defeat either LSU, Auburn or Alabama in Atlanta to take the title, the apparent prerequisite to a national title shot.
Not to be Debbie Downer, but doesn’t that put a little more meat on the "tough schedule" bone and give you some reason why I resorted to all CAPITAL LETTERS just a few paragraphs ago to proclaim that even the calming influence of Mark Richt and a bevy of talent cannot guide us home unscathed?
Who will we lose to, you ask? I’m bold, but not that bold. I personally think Arizona State, Auburn and of course Florida -- and maybe two of those three -- rank highest on the list of upset suspects, but that’s as far as I’ll go. Hell, it could be Central Michigan, the two-time defending MAC champs, for all I know, and at least that would not be a conference loss.
Rather than speculate, what I’d rather do is get to my point. If you accept my somewhat-historically annotated premise that an undefeated season is probably out of reach despite all best efforts and absent real destiny, then what we are really playing for at this point is "track position" (to borrow a NASCAR phrase) when the inevitable stumble occurs. The rule of track position is get to the front of the pack and into clean air, so that later, when you need to get back into the race after a problem, you have far fewer backs to climb over and some energy left to do it. Fortunately, we find ourselves on the poll from the start (yes, that was a pun. Involving NASCAR. Perhaps a first.).
Does anybody believe that if LSU starts lower than # 1 a year ago that they weather two losses down the stretch and still make it to the title game for the annual SEC whitewash of Overrated, excuse me, Ohio State and a national championship? Surely not. They had to start at the top to end at the top, and like purple is the new black, we are the new LSU.
So, from my view, pragmatically, realistically, historically, there is no better position for the Dogs than number 1 preseason at this point in time in the college football universe, if for no reason than it gives us more room to fall softly when a loss occurs. And if we do somehow go undefeated a la Tennessee in ‘98, no one will unseat us anyway, so it’s all good. In highly technical terms, that’s called a "win-win." So do not fret about targets or pressure or 10-year statistical compilations. Instead, take a gander at the big picture, the ring on smirking Les Miles’ hand, imagine all the high school recruits looking at the cover of SI as they ponder their college choice, and be thankful we are where we are at the start. It may be the key to a happy ending.
Feel better about being number one? At least I do.
I agree . . . and I’m dang glad we’re not playing Syracuse! Cale Conley is a University of Georgia graduate and the author of War Between the States: The History of the Georgia-Florida Football Rivalry, originally released in 1992. He is currently working on an update of that book to be released in time for Christmas 2008, so put it on your holiday wish list. When not obsessing about college football, Cale is a lawyer in Atlanta. If you want to pre-order a signed copy of War Between the States (2nd Edition) now, leave a comment to that effect below and we will provide you with the means by which to contact Cale.
Go ’Dawgs!
0 recs |
7
comments
Read Related
Comments
One quibble
And if we do somehow go undefeated a la Tennessee in ‘98, no one will unseat us anyway, so it’s all good.
I am of the belief (like Orson at EDSBS is) that the winner of the Ohio State-USC game will jump Georgia for #1 in the coaches poll. Same with the AP if UGA is #1 there too. It doesn’t bump you out of the title game, and it’s probably better that way anyway since BCS #2 has won the national title 5 of the past 6 years.
A theoretical undefeated Georgia team could take back #1 if some combination of Florida, LSU, and Auburn are top ten teams when it beats them, but that’s not guaranteed this season.
Oh, and in college football’s modern era (post WWII), Florida is 33-28-1 against Georgia. That is all.
by Year2 on Aug 9, 2008 4:43 PM EDT 0 recs
And yet if UGA goes undefeated
It’ll have a good chance to leap-frog back over that team later in the schedule, with mid-to late games against Florida, Auburn, and potentially a very good SECCG opponent (not to mention at this point UGA will have beat a number of other quality opponents, unless they all turn out to be very overrated). No guarantees, of course
Take out the 90s, and Florida is 24-27-1 against Georgia in the modern era (post WWII)!!1111 lolzomg.
May the wings of liberty never lose a feather
by peacedog on
Aug 11, 2008 9:13 AM EDT
up
0 recs
To quote myself
A theoretical undefeated Georgia team could take back #1 if some combination of Florida, LSU, and Auburn are top ten teams when it beats them, but that’s not guaranteed this season.
Thanks for reading.
by Year2 on
Aug 11, 2008 12:18 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Who cares if you're #1 or #2?
So long as you make the title game, that’s all that matters.
by CAJason80 on
Aug 11, 2008 6:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
One game at a time.....
People forget that our 1980 National Champs had to play South Carolina (which was actually a pretty good team that year and boasted the Heisman Trophy winner in George Rogers) and then Florida (they had one loss when they played us) on consecutive weekends. The road trips to Spurrier’s chicken coop and then to Tempe AZ, and also the ballbuster of Baton Rouge-Jacksonville-Lexington-Auburn are awfully formidable. But our team does have the firepower to defeat any of those teams on a one-to-one basis. Doing it in a succession is a more daunting task, but that is what schedules are all about. Ours looks extremely formidable at present, but let us see how it all plays out. Southern Cal was boasting about the toughness of their schedule, especially OOC, a year ago. But when all was said and done, it was rather pathetic: a 1-11 Idaho outfit; a Nebraska team which was so bad that they fired their coach; and of course we all know what happened to Neuter Dame. I don’t for a minute think that our 2008 schedule is that fraudulent, but…..let us wait and see. Yes, I would like a copy of Cale’s book: only I hope that he will have a 2008 Dawg win in the Cocktail Party to record before he releases it. Florida has yet to prove that they can beat us without having their precious little baby blanket of a bye week prior. And they ALSO need us to be playing and getting injured while they are off. That is just a fact of life. Any Gator who doesn’t believe it can look over the history of the past 15 years. That scenario does not exist this year. Nor does it exiist next year. Last time that our two teams met with neither playing off of a bye was in 2004. Us Dawgs had NO reason to lament the result .
by Vindexdawg on Aug 10, 2008 6:55 AM EDT 0 recs
Being ranked #1 is an inherent advantage in the BCS era
despite what many people think.
I’ve got some more thoughts on this somewhere, but if I remember my research correctly, since 2002, the team ranked #1 at the beginning of the season has made the national title game in every. single. year.
If that’s not an advantage, I don’t know what is.
by CAJason80 on Aug 11, 2008 6:30 PM EDT 0 recs
Sigh
You’re making me teary-eyed for the halcyon days of the 1990s, when SEC teams would come to the Carrier Dome to face my Orange and receive a sound thrashing for their efforts. Instead of the present, where Vandy could probably beat us by two touchdowns without sweating.
by drothgery on Aug 14, 2008 2:20 PM EDT 0 recs










