Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Colorado Buffaloes vs. Kansas Jayhawks Preview Bar-right-arrows



Did Bad Bats Deprive the Diamond Dogs of an N.C.A.A. Title?

During the open comment thread for the final game of the College World Series, Hunker Down Dawg asked:

What is with only warning track power?

We need to use their bats.

Hunker Down Dawg’s conclusion may have been more right than he knew. The question was being raised at least as far back as April and now FisheriesDawg has called our attention to John Kaltefleiter’s recent piece in the Athens Banner-Herald arguing that Georgia, Miami (Florida), and North Carolina all are at a disadvantage because their contracts with Nike require them to use baseball bats manufactured by the shoe company rather than the superior bats produced by Easton, the Diamond Dogs’ former baseball equipment supplier.

Kaltefleiter contends that the Red and Black’s "warning track power" only in Omaha quite literally was due to a need to use the same bats Fresno State was using: Easton introduced a new composite bat in April, which combines metal and carbon fiber. During Georgia’s struggles down the stretch---when the Bulldogs’ bats seemingly went silent and the Classic City Canines’ previously unhittable bullpen began blowing leads---a number of Georgia’s losses came against the likes of Alabama, Florida, Fresno State, and Ole Miss. The Crimson Tide, the Gators, the West Coast Bulldogs, and the Rebels all use equipment supplied by Easton. (The other S.E.C. squads on that list also have contracts with Nike, but they cover only basketball and football, so baseball is not affected.)

These are just excuses, though, right? We Georgia fans are looking for any explanation that lets the Diamond Dogs off the hook, so we’re blaming the bats without any legitimate basis, aren’t we? According to Daniel A. Russell of the Kettering University Science and Mathematics Department, who examined this very question in 2005, no, we’re not. Writes Dr. Russell:

The graphite and glass fiber materials used to manufacture composite bats are much lighter than aluminum. In fact, most composite bats have metal rods inserted in the handles in order to bring the weight up to normal values. The lightest bats currently available are composites. As such, it is much easier to shift mass around from barrel end to handle (or the other way around for end-loaded bats) to control the location of the balance point and thus the swing weight. . . .

Composite materials have a distinct advantage over aluminum in that they are anisotropic, which means that the elastic properties of a composite material are not the same in all directions. By changing the angle of the weave in the composite material fabric, the stiffnesses in the longitudinal (along the length of the bat) and circumferential (around the barrel of the bat) directions can be modified pretty much independently of each other, and without changing the distribution of mass along the length of the bat. This means that you can make the barrel of a composite bat soft while still maintaining the stiffness in the handle. Or you could make the handle softer while keeping the barrel stiff. Composite materials provide a manufacturer with a very wide range of possibilities to design a bat to a targeted performance and/or feel. There are composite bats which perform about the same as a lesser quality single-wall aluminum bat. There are composite bats which match the performance of the best double-wall aluminum bats available. And then there are composite bats which outperform any metal bat ever made (including the legendary titanium bats). By adjusting the stiffness of the barrel a manufacturer is able to "tune" the trampoline effect of a bat to increase or decrease performance pretty much as desired.

It sounds like Kaltefleiter is right on target. Damon Evans did the right thing by sweetening David Perno’s contract. The next step, though, is to begin providing the Georgia baseball program with the upgrades it needs to remain competitive at the highest level. This includes not only the need for facilities improvements, but also, apparently, the need for better equipment.

As such S.E.C. schools as Alabama and Florida have proven, it is possible to have one’s cake and eat it, too, by signing lucrative deals with Nike in such major revenue sports as basketball and football while retaining the autonomy to buy the best bats from other manufacturers for the baseball team.

Go ‘Dawgs!

0 recs | Comment 5 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

As an aside

The actual construction and flexibility of the properties in the bat based on the composites is fascinating stuff.

I cant’ find where I read this so take it with a huge grain of salt, but I read a suggestion somrewhere that UGA broke an inordinate number of bats this year. I think the number was 60something. But that number may be off and I can’t recall where I read this so it could be bullshit (people have been carping about the Nike bats for months, now).

I did read in an ABH article that Olsen was using the Nike Composit bat at one point this year, but it didn’t sound like anyone on the team liked the bat.

May the wings of liberty never lose a feather

by peacedog on Jul 3, 2008 2:43 PM EDT   0 recs

The 60 bat figure was in Kaltefleiter's article...

and was Peisel’s estimate on how many they broke. I heard another player estimate it at closer to 200 (though that probably included bats they threw out for being dented as well as breaking). I do know that we broke three of them in the Arkansas series alone, two of them being in one day.

If you’re breaking that many bats, you might as well switch to wood bats because the cost-saving argument for college baseball immediately goes out the window.

by FisheriesDawg on Jul 3, 2008 3:33 PM EDT   0 recs

By the way, I think my best line in Omaha was in game 3 of the finals...

when Cerione (or was it Olson) accidentally threw his bat into the Fresno dugout on a swinging strike. One of Fresno’s players started to bring it back to him and I yelled “no, keep it. We want one of yours.”

by FisheriesDawg on Jul 3, 2008 3:36 PM EDT   0 recs

Nike is falling off

This is just the latest on a long list of ways that UGA’s contract with Nike is holding them back. Nike’s bats are clearly not getting the job done, their new running shoes have been surpassed by competitors, and their swim suits have not been upgraded in three years, during which time Speedo and TYR have come out with three new and much faster models. The school really needs to take this into consideration the next time the sponsorship contract is up

by SG Standard on Jul 3, 2008 8:55 PM EDT   0 recs

New fanshot posted, check it out

I posted a YouTube video that has some relevance to this Nike bat issue. Mr. Gordon Beckham hosts….

Larry Munson: "Whaddya got for us Loran?"
Loran Smith: "Well Larry, I'm down here with Charles Grant...and he just loves boiled peanuts!"
Larry Munson: "Good stuff, Loran"

by loran smith on Jul 6, 2008 5:22 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
College Basketball Preview Luncheon
Uga_small
Tony Franklin Receives Pink Slip
Images_small
A Discussion on the UGA Pass Defense
Small
Let's destroy TENN please
Small
Fill up your own stadium before you make these comments...
Small
A Voice From the Bulldog Diaspora
Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small
Thanks to All the Readers Who Helped Make September the Best Month Ever
Small
Remember last year?
Images_small
Fixing What Ails The Dawgs
Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small
Sometimes, We Have Stereotypes for a Reason

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

ad

Site Meter