As Dr. Elliot Reid Would Say . . .
Frick. Double Frick. The obscenity-challenged Scrubs doctor would probably have no better way to respond to the twin arrests of Justin Anderson and Trinton Sturdivant for simple battery and Michael Lemon's separate arrest for battery. Frankly, I think her approach will suffice.
Anderson and Sturdivant are charged with violation of O.C.G.A. Section16-5-23, one of the more nebulous parts in the criminal code. Basically, you tap someone on the shoulder who doesn't want to be tapped, and you've committed simple battery. Here, it appears that one or both allegedly touched the stomach of a female campus visitor. I don't know if this was accompanied by the standard question "When are you due?"
I do know that when you are 6'5, 320 pounds and approaching people you don't know in darkened breezeways, you really shouldn't touch them. If these allegations are true, it's evidence of criminally bad decision making, even though the offense itself is a misdemeanor.
Michael Lemon's alleged violation of O.C.G.A. Section 16-5-23.1 is also a misdemeanor, but of a somewhat different nature. Details on the incident can be found here. First impression: guys who punch other guys over a girl at a BBQ have usually been drankin'. Lemon is alleged to have done some serious damage to a guy's face with essentially no physical provocation. If true, this is very, very serious. I'm also a little worried that the report indicates that Lemon's "friends" huddled around him while he beat the guy down. If any of those "friends" were also on the football roster, our depth issues could get a little worse.
It's hard to guess what the discipline will be in these situations. A lot of it depends on whether the players in question have prior disciplinary histories, which I frankly do not know. If they do, it's certainly not been of the criminal variety. If I had to say, I'd guess Anderson and Sturdivant get either internal punishment or a one gamer. Lemon's situation however is very worrisome, and is the kind of thing that also often involves a civil lawsuit. My guess is one to two games, plus internal punishment. I understand that Michael has been through a lot, but you can't go all Good Will Hunting on a guy without consequences.
These arrests also drive home a point that Mark Richt and his staff have probably been trying to make their players understand for some time now: the only football players who can really stop this team are the ones actually wearing red and black. Let's hope this serves as a wakeup call for the whole team, not a precursor to 4th of July hijinx.
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
Point of Clarification
I am not sure if I am remembering this correctly. Is it not a mandatory school policy at UGA that when a player is arrested there is a minimum 1 game suspension? I may be wrong about that.
by Kenny483 on
Jul 1, 2008 11:36 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Time for a team meeting
I don’t know how the pecking order on a college football team works, but I think it would be prudent for some of the seniors or, perhaps, our quarterback who is the field general to call a meeting and ask a single, fundamental question: Are you man enough to behave like one? This team has enough talent to be the best to ever play between the hedges. They don’t stand a chance if they can’t get through the next few weeks of summer.
by DavetheDawg on
Jul 1, 2008 12:47 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
And to answer your question Kenny483
No. Punishment for misdemeanor offenses is strictly within Coach Richt’s discretion. He’s out of town at the moment, so it may be a while before we hear anything. The Lemon situation really troubles me though. As I think I’ve mentioned before, Michael went to the high school down the road from my house, at which I serve as an assistant coach (not in football, mind you) in my spare time. To say that these allegations are out of character for him would be a major understatement.
by MaconDawg on
Jul 1, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Dr. Elliot Reid
If one is to invoke the fine (and may I say again, fiiiiiiine) doctor, then I believe it is protocol to provide a picture.
Shame.
by zinzarin on
Jul 1, 2008 5:44 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Having recently gone through my wife’s pregnancy, and knowing lots of people who have been pregnant recently (I’m at that age when a lot of my old college buddies are starting families), I know that a LOT of people think it’s perfectly OK to just go up and touch a pregnant stranger on the stomach. Normal rules of personal space and decorum are thrown out the window and otherwise reasonable people engage in behavior towards a pregnant woman that would be well outside their normal understanding of good taste when the person is not a pregnant woman.
If that’s all that’s going on with the first two guys, I think a stern warning and some public embarrassment are sufficient punishment. Frankly, I hope the incident gets a lot of publicity so that people start understanding that a pregnant woman is not public property, but I see no reason this should be some sort of an unforgivable incident. The third guy is clearly the more serious problem.
Richard Pittman
by Richard Pittman on
Jul 2, 2008 8:44 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Amen Richard!
Well said. I know EXACTLY what you mean in every word. Half the world touches pregnant women on the stomach. I’m all for that stopping, but if that’s all these two guys did then it’s pretty much “no big deal” as far as disciplinary action/Fulmer Cup Points are concerned. Beating somebody down is MUCH more worrisome.
31-17; 14 in a row.
by Xon on
Jul 2, 2008 10:50 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs








