Rebutting the Buckeye Backlash Again
Back in March, Sunday Morning Quarterback had this to say about Ohio State:
I, for one, was having none of it:
Now that the early returns are starting to roll in, Buckeye Commentary has tallied the poll votes and come to this conclusion:
AP voters and the coaches will rank Ohio State highly at the beginning of the season, but given the chance to demote them, the Buckeyes downward slide would most likely be permanent and fatal. Because of the recent past and public outcries, one loss may be too much for the Buckeyes and pollsters to overcome. The assertion that the entire regular season is a playoff may never be truer for any team.
To put it generously, the evidence for this Buckeye backlash is less than overwhelming:
* Mark Schlabach, who has Ohio State languishing all the way down at No. 3, praises the Buckeyes’ "very stingy defense" and touts Beanie Wells as a Heisman Trophy candidate before revealing his deep-seated doubts in this suspicious sentence: "Ohio State is good enough to go through the Big Ten schedule unbeaten, but a Sept. 13 road trip to USC might decide its BCS title hopes."
* Dennis Dodd tosses out the phrase "against my better judgment," revealing his true colors in spite of the fact that he ranks Ohio State No. 1 while offering this explanation:
Todd Boeckman?
Oh, there's this Terrelle Pryor kid too.
I can feel Georgia Nation's hate right now. Like everyone else, I was falling in love with the Bulldogs. They had the momentum, the coach, the talent. But Georgia did lose twice last season and didn't play in the SEC title game. (The truth hurts, so does a three-touchdown loss to Tennessee) The Dawgs are going to have to do better than that -- then win the SEC championship game -- before getting to South Florida.
Ohio State? Jim Tressel has coached his Bucks to three of the last six BCS title games, winning one, so let's not go into full mock mode here. However, the Big Ten has become so soft that even if Ohio State loses to USC on Sept. 13, it should be able to recover to play for the national championship.
Truly, the disdain for the Buckeyes and the fawning over the S.E.C. are palpable. But, wait! There’s more:
* Stewart Mandel ranked Ohio State second, noting that "[i]t’s becoming increasingly clear to me that those three teams are absolutely loaded heading into this season" . . . "those three teams" being Georgia, Ohio State, and Southern California.
* College Football News has Ohio State ranked No. 1 and, after debunking the silly notion that the Buckeyes lack athleticism with the cogent point that the team annually sends scads of players to the N.F.L., the site explains that the former "national punching bag . . . will be good enough to get another shot with almost everyone of note returning." To those who would "let out a collective groan at the thought of OSU in another national title game," College Football News offered the reminder that, "with all the returning talent, this really should be 2008’s best team."
* Matt Hayes vaulted the Buckeyes from seventh to second after spring practice, stating his case plainly:
Ohio State is in the thick of the national title picture -- again. The Buckeyes replace four starters from last fall -- none at critical spots. The addition of uber-recruit QB Terrelle Pryor will give the offense balance, but more impressive is the attitude with which this team went back to work after a second-straight embarrassing loss in the national title game. The reality is this: No other team would've beaten Florida or LSU. The Bucks were the poor saps on the other sideline caught in the tidal wave of two teams with second chances and something to prove.
Of the five sets of rankings released already, two have Ohio State ranked No. 1 and none have the Buckeyes ranked lower than third. O.S.U.’s composite score of 121 narrowly trails that of consensus No. 1 Georgia (123) and well outpaces those of No. 3 Oklahoma (112) and No. 4 U.S.C. (111).
The Buckeyes, it should be noted, face that fourth-ranked Trojan club in Los Angeles on September 13, as well as running up against No. 10 Wisconsin in Madison on October 4, No. 17 Illinois in Champaign on November 15, No. 21 Penn State in Columbus on October 25, and No. 23 Michigan State in East Lansing on October 18.
I’m sorry, but I ain’t buying this "Buckeye backlash" business.
Ohio State, which boasts one of the most storied programs in the history of the sport, has attended three of the last six designated national championship games and has appeared in B.C.S. bowl games five times in the last half-dozen seasons. Everyone agrees that the Buckeyes are one of the two or three best teams in college football right now, and influential voices argue that they ought to be ranked No. 1.
The Buckeyes’ daunting slate includes the autumn’s marquee out-of-conference match-up and five games against teams in the consensus preseason top 25, four of which will be played on the road. If Ohio State goes unbeaten, they’re in the national championship game, no matter how many other teams finish with unblemished records; if the Buckeyes drop one along the way, they’ll still get in ahead of several other once-beaten teams, and probably ahead of an unbeaten A.C.C. or Big East champion.
If the preseason polls are at all accurate---and, after last year, heck, we could be in for a bland, predictable, uneventful year in 2008---it all ought to come out in the wash: No. 1 Georgia, No. 6 Florida, and No. 7 Louisiana State square off with one another in an S.E.C. round-robin; No. 2 Ohio State and No. 4 Southern California meet early in the year; and No. 3 Oklahoma, No. 8 Texas, and No. 12 Texas Tech will battle for the Big 12 South crown, with the winner to meet the victor of the showdown between No. 5 Missouri and No. 11 Kansas in the conference championship game. It seems likely that the process of elimination in selecting the national championship game participants will rely heavily on head-to-head results.
The Buckeyes are a major program in a major conference. Given the toughness of the slate they face, Ohio State will be given every opportunity to earn its way into a third straight national title tilt. What we are witnessing in this oh-woe-is-me hand-wringing by partisans of the No. 2 team in the country is the "backlash to the backlash."
The Buckeyes are one of the three teams whose fans need to learn to cope with being at the top of the food chain. Ohio State is where every team in the country wants to be. The Buckeyes are a perennial source of N.F.L. talent and a constant contender on the national stage. They need to come to grips with the terrible tragedy of being universally recognized as one of the best teams in the land.
Go ‘Dawgs!
1 recs |
5
comments
| Add your comment
Read Related
Comments
I agree
There was some “backlash” in the opinion articles after the title game, but that was mainly because it was the easy article to write. The backlash still exists among fans certainly, but not among the major media.
What your listing of teams in the third to last paragraph shows is that the SEC and Big 12 are the power conferences for next year with a combined 8 teams in the top 12.
Of course, the BCS averages just 50% of its teams from the AP’s preseason top 10, and 2003 was the only year there wasn’t a team unranked in the AP preseason top 10 that made the BCS. In 2002, there was only one, and every other year there’s been at least two preseason unranked teams in the BCS.
by Year2 on
May 9, 2008 5:25 PM EDT
reply
0 recs
Forgot to include
Forgot to include the first two BCS years there; 1998 had no preseason unranked teams and 1999 had one.
There should be a comment editing system or something.
by Year2 on
May 9, 2008 5:33 PM EDT
up
reply
0 recs
Well ...
... I somewhat disagree.
It seems to me that the recent travails of Ohio State may well leave an impression on the AP voters if they drop a game. Would it be “permanent and fatal?” I don’t really know, but one would have thought LSU’s loss to Kentucky last year might have been much more “permanent and fatal” than an OSU loss to one of its many powerhouse opponents next year.
Still, one cannot deny the fact that the seed of doubt in Tressel’s ability to “win the big one” has been firmly planted, some might even say deeply embedded, into the hearts and minds of college football fans the last two years. That doubt is surely present in the AP voters as well, although I expect they would be loath to admit that.
With all that said, thoughtful AP voters (oxymoron?) would have to consider the way things went in 2007. If you can make an argument for forgiving LSU dropping 2 games to lower-level non-BCS bowlers, it surely can’t be a reach to do the same for an OSU team that theoretically loses to two BCS-bowl teams, n’est ce pas?
A Sea of Blue -- Kentucky Sports for the Discerning Fan
by Truzenzuzex on
May 10, 2008 9:08 AM EDT
reply
0 recs
I actually made a comment about some pre season Ohio State hype at Groo's blog
But there was a national guy who was already pre-justifying OSU being #2 in the nation with only a loss to USC, which is absurd (note, if that happens then ask me at the end of next year if I think they’ll be #2 and I’ll tell you, and there’s certainly a pretty decent chance theyc ould be. But it’s ridiculous to make up one’s mind about such things now).
Backlash? Not exactly.
May the wings of liberty never lose a feather
by peacedog on
May 12, 2008 8:31 AM EDT
reply
0 recs
Full disclosure:
In the interests of thoroughness and evenhandedness, I should call your attention to Sunday Morning Quarterback’s subsequent posting upon this subject.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on
May 13, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
reply
0 recs










