Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Wednesday Morning Dawg Bites

These are busy times in Bulldog Nation, so much that is afoot requires our attention. Consequently, and without further ado, I offer you a quick run-down of events of note, on the field and in the blogosphere, complete with a rare admission of error on my part, so you'll want to be sure to read all the way to the end:

O.K., not so much with the shaving for me lately, but still. . . .

I hope...

...you'll be ready to post something giving Les Miles a little credit if LSU wins a conference title or more this year.


I wrote in reply:
Billy:

You may rest assured that I will give credit where credit is due if Coach Miles leads the Bayou Bengals to a conference or national title. If he manages not to say anything along the way that makes us all look bad as S.E.C. fans, he will win points with me for that, as well.

Thanks for visiting Dawg Sports and for taking the time to share your views.

Sincerely,

T. Kyle King


I sent that e-mail on July 15, 2007, and Louisiana State went on to win the national title, on my BlogPoll ballot as well as in all the major polls. Thereafter, I received the following e-mail from Billy, which arrived on Valentine's Day 2008 and comes to you accompanied by a strong adult language advisory (not to mention a serious need for some proofreading):
I'm sending you this email now with your response from last summer inclosed [sic.] to basically call [sic.] bullshit on your whole "Les Miles is the dumbest coach to ever win [sic.] a national title" idea. You said this summer you'd give him credit. So he's got a national title, but he's still an idiot? Then I guess you must not think much of the following coaches:

Nick Saban
Urban Meyer
Tommy Tubberville [sic.]
Bob Stoops
Jim Tressell [sic.]
Charlie Weiss [sic.]
Steve Spurrier

Miles has beaten them all in his 3 seasons in Baton Rouge. I know its [sic.] hard to admit when you're wrong, but for him to truly be [sic.] this dumb, I guess the rest of the SEC is filled with people who are even dumber. Either that or coaching must REALLY not matter, because Miles is winning 11 games a year despite being apparently a functioning retard. Are you seriously that deluded to believe this? Georgia's been recruiting at a pretty damn comparable level the last few years, so if talent can really overcome coaching that badly, why doesn't Mark Richt have more to show for it?

If Miles is a bad coach for "going 10-2 with 12-0 talent," as you've said, what does that make Mark Richt last season? Given that he lost at home to a 6-6 South Carolina team and got skullfucked by Tennessee? Or how about in 2004 when he couldn't win the East despite Greene, Pollack, Davis, Pope, Thurman, Brown and Gibson? How many NFL guys were on that team?

In general, I find you to be a decent analyst regarding football, but this continued bashing of Les Miles is so one-sided and ignorant of the facts that it's really getting pretty sad.

Give the man his due. He obviously knows how to do something right.


Surely every denizen of the blogosphere, whether blogger, commenter, or lurker, knows by now that I stand resolutely in the camp that believes you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, so I cannot claim that I cotton to Billy's approach; he might have gotten a more favorable reaction from me, and one accompanied by fewer qualifications, had he gone about his objective a bit less brusquely (and with fewer split infinitives). Accordingly, ere I concede his basic premise, permit me to add a couple of caveats.

Really, has getting a Southern lawyer riled up ever been a good idea?

If I were making a case for Les Miles's coaching acumen, I don't think I'd be hurling animadversions and imprecations regarding another team's success against the Tennessee Volunteers. (Mark Richt has a winning record against the Big Orange and his assistant coaches have never had to dissuade him from attempting frantically to call a time out during a clock stoppage.) Likewise, if I were an L.S.U. fan, I don't know that I'd be too terribly critical of Georgia's 2004 team.

I likewise don't know that my basic criticism of Les Miles---that he guides 13-0 talent to an 11-2 record---necessarily has been debunked by a 12-2 season, particularly in light of his decision to throw the ball in the final seconds against Auburn, which (as noted by Orson and by Sunday Morning Quarterback) was an ill-considered move, no matter how much MGoBlog tried to justify it when defending the man Brian Cook then mistakenly believed would be Michigan's next coach. (To Brian's credit, he knew in more temperate and less error-prone times that the Miles-to-Michigan movement was worse than orthogonally wrong.)

Nevertheless, a promise is a promise; I wrote last July that I would give Coach Miles credit if he led L.S.U. to an S.E.C. championship or a national title, and he did both of those things, guiding the Fighting Tigers to victory with a series of gutsy fourth-down calls against Florida. He may have needed a heck of a lot of help to do it, but do it he did, and, although I'm glad to know that my head coach is not so desperately in need of defending that I'd have hung onto an e-mail for seven months just so I could tell the author of it that I told him so, the fact is that Billy told me so, and I am a man of my word.

Billy, if you're out there reading this, you were right and I was wrong: Les Miles is a better coach than I gave him credit for being, and he has the national championship to prove it. Personally, I don't think he's in a class with Mark Richt---who, unlike Les Miles, has (a) a season with fewer than two losses in his ledger, (b) more than one conference championship to his credit, and (c) a 1-0 record in head-to-head competition with the other guy---but, like Sunday Morning Quarterback says, the crystal ball cures all.

Go 'Dawgs!

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well said
Although I agree that it seems a bit strange to tenaciously hold onto such an email over the course of an entire season (plus a couple of months), your critic should be prepared to promptly give you credit for responding publicly.  And I agree that to cavalierly bring up the 2004 season --

-- oh, it's too hard.  I give up.

by NCT on Feb 20, 2008 8:51 AM EST reply actions  

Big of you
I've gone from thinking that Miles is dumb to thinking that he's crazy in a manner similar to Colonel Kilgore. I think he would surf in a war zone if the opportunity presented itself, and I have no doubt that he's overly fond of napalm.

by DamGoodDawg on Feb 20, 2008 9:25 AM EST reply actions  

That analogy . . .
. . . is creepy scary good.

You just knew he was going to get through the S.E.C. without a scratch!

I'm now picturing him running onto the field to the tune of "Flight of the Valkyries."

Nice job.

by T Kyle King on Feb 20, 2008 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I know who Brittany Snow is.
She was on that "American Dreams" TV show, and she's been in a few other movies that the Lady has watched with me in the room - Hairspray and John Tucker Must Die.

She's cute and sort of likable, if very young though.

by LD on Feb 20, 2008 9:52 AM EST reply actions  

LD . . .
. . . I should have known better than to have doubted the encyclopedic nature of your knowledge.

My bad.

by T Kyle King on Feb 20, 2008 6:02 PM EST up reply actions  

to boldly go
There's no iron-clad rule to suggest that the infinitive should not be split in English. The notion that the infinitive should never be split is an artifact of late 19th century efforts to codify a more formal version of English, but that need not constrain us entirely to this day. We are German neither in grammar nor in prescriptivist language management.

Alternatively, if it was good enough for Chaucer, it's certainly good enough for me.

Both of the instances from your correspondent, as cited above, could be taken as examples of infinitives split for emphasis, which is legitimate in contemporary American usage.

There's no excuse for the spelling errors and repudiation of apostrophes, however.

by DC Trojan on Feb 20, 2008 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

I admit it . . .
. . . I am overly devoted to avoiding the splitting of infinitives. (I have to restrain myself from correcting them when reviewing the legal drafting of other attorneys.)

Kudos to you for taking advantage of my recent run of "Star Trek" references by citing Captain Kirk's opening narration in support of your argument. Very well done, indeed.

In my defense, I freely acknowledge that I am an uptight grammar nerd. My desire to avoid ending sentences with prepositions has led me to eschew the baseball term "R.B.I." for the term "R.I.W.W.B.": the run in which was batted.

I have even been known to use a ten-word phrase of which the last eight words were ". . . and the horse in on which you rode." Under certain circumstances, I am willing to be vulgar for the sake of emphasis, but there simply is no excuse for mangling the language.

by T Kyle King on Feb 20, 2008 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

split infinitives
Actually, I'm not all that fired up about the split infinitive thing, myself.  I read somewhere it was in an effort to force English grammar to conform to Latin grammar: since Latin infinitives are single words, they cannot be split; English, on the other hand, gives us greater freedom.

As for prepositions, Kyle, did you hear about the boy's complaint when his father came upstairs to read him the wrong bedtime story?

"What did you bring that book I don't want to be read to out of up for?"

And one more thing: have you seen the illustrated version of The Elements of Style?  It's great.  My folks gave it to each of us children for Christmas a couple of years ago.

by NCT on Feb 20, 2008 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

not serious, but reflexive
Between being raised by parents who were provided a sound Scottish education (reinforced with the belt at my father's school and the cane at my mother's), studying 4 years of Latin, and having a wife who was raised by my professor-of-English father-in-law, being moderately serious about grammar has never been a matter of principle for me, so much as one of survival.

by DC Trojan on Feb 20, 2008 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

As an RBR author...
...I'm still trying to figure out how Rosario Dawson and Alessandra Ambrosio didn't make it out of the first round. Our girlfight voting had more irregularities in it than an election in Chicago.
Roll Tide!

by Nico @ Dawg Sports on Feb 20, 2008 12:43 PM EST reply actions  

Clearly . . .
. . . some of those voters never saw "Clerks II."

by T Kyle King on Feb 20, 2008 6:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I had no idea
that Brittany Snow had beat Rachel Bilson.  There must have been some MAJOR voter fraud imo for this travesty of a result to occur.

To answer your question Kyle, I actually had to google Snow to jog my memory to get a visual of her.  After remembering that she played sort of sex kitten character(she is my age) in Nip/Tuck three seasons ago (I used to watch the show back then) I could see why people would maybe voted for her (not to mention her role in L&O SVU as a sex crazed student of an older professor in a few episodes.  Another one of my fave shows but I digress.)

All in all, I had to ask my girlfriend what else she  was in and she promptly responded with two movies I've never seen, "John Tucker Must Die" (ironically Bilson is in that movie as well) and "Hairspray".  After reviewing the bracketing, I would have voted for Scarlett before Snow but I must admit she is attractive.

The only thing not going for Snow is that she is not as well known as the others.  With that said, my conclusion is that I can see why people might put her in the finals over Johannson (younger, vixen look, not blonde for those that like that).  And not to mention the roles I stated above were very likely to have swung the vote her way, with Bilson being like you said Kyle, a more wholesome type if you will.

by loran smith on Feb 20, 2008 1:43 PM EST reply actions  

Lucas
I stumbled upon this site recently, and despite not being a Georgia fan, I must say I enjoy it.

The George Lucas look is intentional, right?

by ragnarok on Feb 20, 2008 3:36 PM EST reply actions  

Ouch!
I'm really, really hoping it's just that picture, as George Lucas is not the look for which I was going!

I have nothing against Lucas, who was responsible for one of the great moments of my youth (I was 14 years old when I sat in a theatre and saw Princess Leia in a gold bikini, an image that had the same resonance for me that it had for the male members of the cast of "Friends"), but I don't want to look like him.

If it weren't for the show of solidarity with Bulldog Nation, I'd shave the darn thing rather than let this particular consensus form.

by T Kyle King on Feb 20, 2008 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Contrary to popular belief...
...the only voter fraud that took place in the fiasco we once knew as Girl Fight '08 was on the part of Rachel McAdams who had a fanatical group of message board devotees stuff the ballot box twice (the first time, by the way, is how Jessica Biel didn't advance, and the second time resulted in my decision to say "screw it" and annoint Bilson the winner of that round anyway, causing much wailing and gnashing of teeth on their part).  Snow won fair and square, which worked out pretty well considering she was my favorite to begin with.

by Todd @ Dawg Sports on Feb 20, 2008 10:28 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

017oa_small MaconDawg

Editors

Redstage_small DavetheDawg

Whistling_past_small NCT

434477_small vineyarddawg

Layfield_logo_small RedCrake

Hey-why-so-serious_small tankertoad

Podunkdawg_as_a_child_small podunkdawg

Dawggone_small Ludakit

Authors

28488_443996218101_804558101_5903592_3665419_n_small Spears

Small hailtogeorgia

Killface_small Mr. Sanchez

50questions-accountant_small The Quincy Carter of Accountants