Georgia Bulldog Football: The State of Things From One Fan's Perspective.
The first time you quit, it's hard. The second time, it gets easier.
The third time, you don't even have to think about it.
----Paul "Bear" Bryant
I've watched the University of Georgia win a lot of football games over the years. There have been big wins and little ones. SEC Championship Games and early season tuneups against the directional school du jour.
I've also watched a good number of losses. Not so many in the past 7 years as before. Not as many as a South Carolina or Vanderbilt fan of comparable age, but still several dozen. Each of those losses has a different character when viewed in hindsight, a different bitter flavor that is unmistakable even years later. Some are more bitter than others.
Saturday's was more bitter than most. As several of you have noted, it's one thing to lose to what may well be the two best teams in the country. It's another to lose to a Georgia Tech team that was not only less talented, but also exceptionally depleted by injuries. My team, your team, our team did not play up to its potential on Saturday. Again.
Coach Bryant was right. Those who quit as a matter of habit scarcely even realize that they're doing it, or why. This team has made rolling over and dying an art form this season, and it's impossible for me to understand fully the reason. Corvey Irvin gave one clue when he said that "In the first half, we were all over the field having fun, and I guess we kind of lost our composure. I guess we thought we had the game wrapped up in our pocket, but we really didn't."
That's a brilliant deduction, Sherlock Holmes. This team got bludgeoned in the first half by Alabama before almost getting back into it in the second, then got smoked in the second half to cement an embarrassing loss to Florida. How they could possibly not understand that a football game consists of two halves, and that failing to play one of them usually means you lose, is beyond me.
And while I am among the bloggers least likely to call for coaching heads to roll, make no mistake, this one falls squarely on the coaches. When you listened to this coaching staff for most of this underwhelming season, you could detect a smidgen of satisfaction. A bit of blase. It was as if they didn't see all the little things that were going wrong, and were focused only on the wins and losses. But you can only win ugly for so long. Once in a while winning ugly is gritty. When you do it every week it's just ugly football.
It's hard to turn a football team around when it starts down the wrong path. And this team has. They play soft. They play stupid. And the coaches have tolerated it. Because of injuries and what we thought would be a grueling late season schedule, they dialed back on the contact in practice from the get-go. That was a terrible miscalculation, as Coach Richt (to his credit) has admitted. The result was a team playing lots of backups who weren't prepared for the intense competition they would face on Saturdays. We were just as injured, but less prepared. In retrospect, it was a strategic decision on par with making childrens' candy in the shape of Lego blocks. In both scenarios, some kid choked, but you couldn't really blame him.
The coaches have tolerated terrible special teams play. They've made excuses for it. What they haven't done is find a way to fix it. I've become convinced that what we need is a fulltime special teams coach. A veteran guy who has nothing to do but make sure that we have a handle on the little things in the kicking game, and who can occasionally scheme in a wrinkle or two that give us the edge in a close game. Like the one we just lost.
That guy might also consider putting somebody besides Richard Samuel back to return kickoffs. I think the guy has loads of potential as a bruising tailback, but he's miscast in this role. He doesn't have the shift or shake at 220 pounds to make the gunners miss. He's returned kicks he should have fair caught, and fumbled at the worst possible times. Why Asher Allen is no longer filling this role is beyond me, unless it's that our starters are too good to play special teams. We wouldn't want them to get tired, after all.
Urban Meyer sure doesn't want Chris Rainey to get tired, either. I can't figure out how the sneaky little devil keeps getting in the game on special teams. Oh yeah, his coaches are willing to do what it takes to win. And I'm not even going to address Blair Walsh's stupifying inability to kick a football into the endzone despite having, allegedly, one of the strongest legs in recent memory. Is it effort? Coaching? I don't know, but it's got to be fixed.
I hate to say it, Bulldog Nation, but we are at a crossroads. We should know in a matter of weeks whether we will be losing the only quarterback on our roster with significant game experience and the tailback who arguably kept this foundering ship afloat. My guess is that we lose both. We will be opening the season on the road in 2009 against an Oklahoma State team that could start the season in the top 5. Florida will be better next season behind a veteran offensive line, maturing defense, and a stable of returning skill players. Georgia Tech will have a full year of option offense and better personnel to run it.
LSU will be LSU, only with their new Jamarcus Russell clone at quarterback instead of a semiautomatic interception dispenser disguised as Jarrett Lee. Even Arkansas looks like a much better team under Bobby Petrino than they did in the early going. Anyone who tells you a 5-7, Auburn-style implosion is out of the question next year is sorely mistaken. Speaking of Auburn, does anyone really think they'll be worse than they were this season? Just another little something to chew on.
Inexperience in key positions and a tough schedule are bad enough. A lack of discipline and focus won't make things any better. As a preliminary list, here are things that one guy thinks need to happen if we are to put this disappointing season in the rearview:
- Getting healthy. The injuries took their toll this season. Make no mistake about that. While injuries in fall camp are no excuse for phoning it in on defense in the second half of the twelfth game, they did deprive this team of a lot of momentum in the early going. It seemed like we spent a lot of time just trying to get our collective heads back above water while other teams (Florida comes to mind) swam past us Michael Phelps-style. This team will get a lot better if we can just keep the same 11 guys on the field at the same time.
- A fulltime special teams coordinator. As noted above, our special teams put us in bad positions all year long. Missed field goals, bad kickoffs, poor coverage and poorer kick returning put this team behind the eight ball on a dozen or more drives. A coach of mine once told us that there are three phases to a football game, offense, defense and special teams. He believed that if you won two out of three of them, you would have a hard time losing. My subsequent observations have not proven him wrong. If we're going to play with an inexperienced quarterback and refuse to play consistent defense, we need to at least win the special teams battle. Coach Fabris is a great coach. Anyone who's seen him work up close knows that there's not a better motivator in college football. The guy can get you jacked up from 50 feet away. But asking him to handle both special teams and our young defensive ends is just too much. Speaking of which . . .
- Better defensive end play. I am not a proponent of firing Willie Martinez. It's amazing how quickly people have forgotten his "brilliant" gameplans against Hawaii, Florida and Oklahoma State in 2007. However, if we're going to win with his system we have to have all the parts. This means somebody has to become a game changer on the outside. I'm less convinced than before that it's going to be Rod Battle. But Justin Houston looked better and better as the year went on, and may be the guy. Cornelius Washington is a fast, physical edge rusher, and Toby Jackson has as quick a first step as I've seen. Whoever we look to, Coach Fabris has a heck of a job ahead of him, one which needs to be his primary focus.
- First Snap. Last Snap. Every Snap. It occurred to me over the weekend that the "Finish the Drill" mantra is a good one. But after 7 years it may have finally become so much background noise. This is my personal attempt at a new motto for this team, which has either failed to show up for the first snap or failed to hang around mentally for the last one. I'll be printing up the teeshirts later. Preorder now.
- Contact and competition. This team looked soft to me. And football teams don't go soft overnight, nor do they toughen back up overnight. If I see another damned trip to the pool during fall camp, or hear about the players "deserving a day off" in August, I'm going to go apoplectic. This team needs a steel-toed boot jammed into it in the worst way. It needs to be reminded that "good enough" just isn't good enough. On the road of life, you generally wind up getting precisely as far as you're willing to carry yourself, and this team has shown a tendency to be pretty satisfied with itself prior to Saturday. We'll see if they still are come bowl season.
I'll be back this evening to talk some hoops. Until then, feel free to add your suggestions in the comments, and . . .
Go 'Dawgs!!!
0 recs |
28 comments
Comments
100% on the Money
especially concerning special teams. It is widely known that Urban Meyer treats his special teams like the royalty of the team. Special Teams can change the momentum in a split second of a game(Prince Miller punt return against Alabama). The need for a special teams coordinator is undeniable and hopefully will be addressed this off-season.
by EMAN09 on
Dec 3, 2008 10:30 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
He does now...
…but he didn’t always. Really good article on ESPN.com about just that.
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/secconf/0-3-9/Special-teams-haven-t-always-been-so-special-to-Meyer.html
This sounds like some strategy that Coach Richt should take a look at.
by wqueenjr on
Dec 3, 2008 1:46 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
“I watch their kickoff return, and I know exactly what kind of team we’re getting ready to play,” Meyer said. “If it’s sloppy and disorganized and unmotivated, I get really excited because I think we’re going to beat the mess out of that team.”
I wonder what he was thinking the Sunday prior to the WLOCP.
by wwcmrd? on
Dec 3, 2008 2:18 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good stuff as usual
A few things to add and a question:
Like you noted, you can only win ugly so many times. Every now and then you have a team that wins a lot of ugly games. There are two ways to do that, find a way to win or barely not lose. This team seemed to favor the latter. Teams that win ugly usually have one of two things happen the following year: either they were a team on the upswing and they start winning consistently or they show their true colors and take a fall (see Chicago Bears a few years ago). I fear we might be heading for the latter again unless the changes you noted are made.
Finally, when Richt first started at UGA our special teams were one of our strong points: blocking punts, blocking FGs, returning punts, making FGs, etc. I can’t remember us being particularly strong on KO returns- we had a few big ones, but that wasn’t the norm- and I think we were at least average at KOC. Where did all that go? I know there have been 2 rule changes that affected us- no more “Boss Bailey FG blocks” and moving the KOs back five, but did those 2 things turn our ST into the SUCKTASTIC mess that it is? Who was running the STs then?
by fotodog on
Dec 3, 2008 10:50 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
fotodog I would look . . .
even more recently. Last year Asher Allen had 27 kickoff returns for 659 yards. That’s 24.4 per return, and 10 yards shy of the Georgia single season record for kickoff returns, even though he didn’t even return all the kicks. The thing is that Coach Fabris has been in charge of special teams the whole time, unless I’m mistaken. This year saw unbelievably poor execution, though, which was uncharacteristic. I’m not sure what to do about the kickoffs. I’m not sure how Blair Walsh went from bombing 60 yarders on field goals to not being able to reach the goaline on kickoffs. I don’t know if it was a case of deadleg or just basic inconsistency. Either way, it was a recurring theme and absolutely killed us.
I like to use this analogy. An offensive drive is, in some respects, like a manned space mission. You’re counting on a lot of moving parts to fire in sequence from Cape Canaveral all the way into the cosmos. The longer the trip, the better the odds of something, some little bolt or washer buried deep wthin the hulking machine, going awry. If you make teams go 80 yards, they generally have to pick up 1-2 more first downs than if they only have to go 60. That’s a lot more chances for the offense to misfire.
We haven’t required teams to put it all together for long drives this season, with the possible exceptions of the LSU and Vanderbilt games. And even then we weren’t terribly consistent about it. That’s a killer even with a great defense. With a patchwork, youthful unit like the one we fielded, it’s a recipe for disaster. See, Cocktail Party 2008 for Exhibit A.
by MaconDawg on
Dec 3, 2008 11:12 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't blame Walsh
I’ve talked to guys on special teams, and he did what he was told to do. Fabris want kickoffs placed at the ten yard line close to the sidelines. He wanted to give kick coverage more time to get downfield. Of course, if you put it deep in the endzone, that becomes moot. I would love to know why we kept this up when it became clear that there was a better than average chance for the kick to go out of bounds or in windy conditions, like on Saturday.
The special teams problem goes deeper than that. You can just tell it isnt being coached well. Samuel has awful technique. He always catches the ball too high up and while backing up. On Saturday, he would line up for a return at the five, step up to the seven, then have to run back to the two to make the catch. That should have been corrected after the first kick. Catch it going forward, and get to full speed as soon as you possibly can. I totally agree that we need a full time special teams coach.
by SG Standard on
Dec 3, 2008 3:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Willie Martinez
In that Florida game last year we still gave up 30 points. That’s a win for the offense, not Willie. The win against Oklahoma State also came against a 7-6 team that lost to Troy that season.
I just don’t think Willie deserves a pass. Kyle already made a good post putting up some pretty alarming numbers. The defense has given up more PPG each successive year since Willie’s been in control. The 30+ points in games, the soft defense, letting mediocre QBs tear the defense apart. After 4 years I think we’ve seen what WM has to offer and we should probably expect the same.
by McDawg on
Dec 3, 2008 11:28 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
My friend's discription of 2008 UGA football -
you know what I feel like right now with UGA football… you know if Forest Gump, where he is running and a bunch of people follow him all over the country, then all of a sudden he just stops in the desert and is like “I think i’ll just go home now” and he turns around and everyone is like wtf, and one guy just looks at him and says, “now what do we do?”… i feel like that dude.
by knowshon loves legos on
Dec 3, 2008 11:59 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
to knowshon loves legos. That is about the long and short of it.
And McDawg, I think this is one of those times when looking at the numbers from one game divorced from the surrounding context can be deceiving. Here are the point totals given up by other teams to Florida’s offense in 2007: Tennessee-59 (ouch), LSU-28, Kentucky-45 (burn), Vandy-49 (yikes), South Carolina-51 (suck it, Stevey), FSU-45 (don’t tell Coach Bowden, he still hasn’t heard and it would just kill him), and Michigan-35 (Lloyd Carr . . . defensive genius). Only Auburn, which gave up 20 points in a September game before the offense really got rolling, held the Gators under 4 touchdowns. That 30 points looks pretty danged good when you judge it against what other good teams did. Note that every team on that list save Vandy and the Gamecocks went bowling.
Florida was also the only game, other than when Troy put up 14 junk points in the 4th quarter to get to 34, in which our defense gave up more than 23 points in 2007. We were number 3 in the SEC in both scoring defense and total defense (behind only LSU and Auburn, arguably the two best defenses in the country). So, to say that it’s been a uniform downward progression would be decidedly inaccurate.
That being said, there have got to be some changes made on that defense in terms of personnel, scheme or both. The fact that it wasn’t broken last year doesn’t mean that it isn’t broken this year. I just think that getting rid of Coach Martinez at this point would have sme consequences. I think I may lay those out later this week.
by MaconDawg on
Dec 3, 2008 12:37 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Technically our defense didn't...
…give up more than 23 against Florida in 07. 7 of the 30 points they scored came from a pick six and PAT. Which really just makes this year hurt even more.
by wqueenjr on
Dec 3, 2008 1:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great Post
I too agree that we are over the hump of being relevant again in the SEC year after year, but we don’t seem to be able to “blow the lid off” like we thought after the 2002 season.
The key to the Willie Martinez/Brian Van Gorder defense is pressure from the front 4. When you have pressure from the front 4 you a) don’t have to blitz as much, and when you do it is even more effective. This also makes the DB’s look better since they don’t have to cover as long. Next year if we develop a pass rushing DE our defense will be significantly better.
by RocketDawg on
Dec 3, 2008 1:04 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Absolutely right
With the defense Martinez likes to run, a killer pass rushing DE is not just a plus, but is a requirement. Without one, the zone coverages we rely on can and have been picked apart. I have a problem with that in general, but that is not why I was so upset with his performance this season. Early on, it became obvious that we did not have that Marcus Howard type of pass rusher. Losing Jeff Owens, who could be disruptive from the middle only compounded the problem. Faced with these truths, Martinez did not adjust his defensive strategy. He continued to run a defense that acted as if we would be getting that massive rush up front. With no adjustments, that strategy was doomed to fail.
by SG Standard on
Dec 3, 2008 3:07 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Willie
Macon, I like most of your points. And I don’t want to sound like one of “those guys” but Willie Martinez doesn’t get a pass here. Our defense has looked good at times. Great even. Most of the time against subpar offenses (and OK State last year was barely par), but there has been the occasional big game where I left really impressed with our defensive play. However, there is a trend on our defense that can’t be denied. We tend to fold (at least for a half) in big games. Fold isn’t even the word. We just DON’T PLAY defense in these games. Nobody expected us to shut out Tech. No sane person expected us to shut-down the option attack. But to give up 45 points while Nesbitt only completes one pass for an entire game is a failure of epic proportions. Even when they are put in a bad situation, CWM’s defenses don’t even contest the ensuing score. The seem to just watch it happen as if it’s inevitable. The fact we have games (often times a couple) every year where thes failures happen, makes our defense a liability IF we want to make the move at the next level. It’s gotten to the point now, you almost have to look at the schedule and wonder when, not if, it will happen. As long as those games happen, in this conference, it’s going to be real hard to break through. When the defense is good, it’s good. When it’s bad, it’s non-existant.
I don’t put as much stock in the scoring stats as some people do. Our turnovers and inconsistencies have hurt there. But look at the yards. We give up A LOT of yards. When you give up yards like that, you start losing field position battles. Look at UF’s average starting field position versus their opponents. That is a result of special teams, and a smothering defense. Even when our D is good, it’s not smothering.
No one fears our defense….besides the WAC.
I don’t know what to do about the special teams. Maybe getting someone there full-time will help. But the defensive failures will continue to hold this team back if something is not corrected. I think a strong message needs to be sent to the players, other coaches, the rest of the SEC, fans, the donors, and especially the recruits that CMR is serious about taking this team to the next level. Mediocrity won’t be tolerated. A good defense some weeks, and NO defense other weeks won’t cut it. I really do think changing the tone of the program is going to require Mark Richt to make a difficult decision he doesn’t want to make. In each of our jobs, we are responsible for the ultimate outome we produce. Circumstances do not matter. Wille Martinez is compensated handsomely for his services. I don’t think the outcomes Willie Martinez is producing justifies his sticking around.
by AtlantaDawg on
Dec 3, 2008 1:09 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
About quitting
I posted a longer version of this in a FanPost, but I’ll summarize it again here. It struck me that in six of our nine wins we never trailed the other team. The largest deficit we overcame to win a game this season was 6 points to 5-7 Auburn. The most consecutive points scored on our defense were the touchdowns on either side of halftime at the Central Michigan game.
Contrast that to our three losses: in the Bama, Florida and Tech games, we trailed by a maximum of 31, 46 and 12 (respectively) and allowed unanswered scoring runs of 31, 42 and 26 (respectively).
As MaconDawg pointed out, while the first two could be “excused” by the SEC Division champs’ talent, the Tech game reveals a trend: the 2008 Georgia team is incapable of playing from behind. Whenever we were faced by a team with any sort of momentum, we simply fell apart. Our players looked shocked, dazed and confused. It’s one thing to expect to win a game; it’s another thing to be so full of yourself that when another team challenges you, instead of rising to the occasion you simply quit because you can’t believe another team has the audacity to challenge you.
Apparently the pre-season hype was too much for this team, and too much for the coaches. A #1 ranking wasn’t too much for USC in 2004 and or USC 05 and tOSU 06 (in terms of making the title game). Why should it have been too much for UGA 08, except for coaching?
by wwcmrd? on
Dec 3, 2008 1:22 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
The Special Teams article on Meyer
just a different mindset.
Remember when there was talk of Knowshon returning punts?
Everyone in Dawg Nation from our coaches to our fans* said “No way, he can’t get hurt.”
You read that article and you got Tim Tebow wanting to play special teams, and the thing is, I can all but guarantee he’s not just saying that. Tebow would definitely take the chance to play special teams if Meyer would let him.
It’s that killer instinct we’re missing, and it sucks.
- I know not ALL fans.
by UgaBulldog14 on
Dec 3, 2008 2:46 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
New Motto: 60 Minutes of Football
not Mark Richt and the 30 Minute Men
by millenniumdawg on
Dec 3, 2008 3:09 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Where is the gap?
It’s not talent, we all agree there. On offense, our talent performs. Hats off the Richt, Bobo, Searls, etc.
On special teams, I’m not convinced we have our best talent out there for that, but there are also schematic things we need to fix. I don’t know if a lot of schools have a dedicated ST coach, but it will be a moot point if we don’t make sure we have the athletes in the field to make the plays. I also would like to hear Fabris explain and defend these directional kicks. I don’t get it.
On defense, our talent doesn’t peform. This lies with coaching. Injuries happen. Especially in the SEC. But if we have a defensive scheme / coaching staff that can’t get results unless we have our 11 absolute best defensive talents on the field for 4 quarters, 12 games a year, that is a bad scheme / coaching. Willie Martinez has gone out of his way to point out blown assignments and lack of execution lately. Almost as if he’s trying to take the heat off of himself. We’ll guess what Willie, it’s your job to make sure that our players execute and perform. Charlie Strange’s guys do it. Muschamp’s guys do it, John Thompson’s (in Columbia) guys do it. Yours do not.
by AtlantaDawg on
Dec 3, 2008 5:42 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Damon Evans, this is the moment...
… when you decide whether you want to be good or great
Florida has had a great athletic director for over a decade. We’ve had a retired football coach, and his young protege.
I can’t say it better than I said it the first time, but unless expectations are raised for the Georgia football program, we will not achieve great success. Good, but not great.
by 34hawk on
Dec 3, 2008 8:13 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Special Teams Coach
Back in the day, Coach Bill Hartman (Rest in Peace), served as Kicking Coach. He was a volunteer coach until the NCAA did away with volunteer coaches. I remember that he stayed on one more year by taking a class; therefore, he was classified a Grad Asst. coach. I say that coaching staff should talk to Kevin Butler about being special teams coach. Get him to take a couple of classes so that you can get around the NCAA rules. That way to you don’t have to get to get rid of one of the other coaches. Just an idea.
by Fishwater_UGA on
Dec 3, 2008 8:22 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
FIRST SNAP. LAST SNAP. EVERY SNAP!
Love the Motto.Absolutely love it! I say we take initiative and send the team 200 red t-shirts with it in Big Bold Black lettering.
Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but only one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.
I Corinthians 9:24
by Southern Dawg on
Dec 3, 2008 10:08 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
In all seriousness . . .
. . . if we did get T-shirts with that slogan on the front and the Dawg Sports URL on the back, who would be interested in buying one?
MaconDawg and I talked about it yesterday, and I have been in contact with a guy, but I don’t yet know whether it would be feasible financially, so I’m trying to gauge interest here.
I’m not asking anyone to pre-order or anything; we’re nowhere near that far along, and it may turn out to be cost-prohibitive, but we’re looking into it and I’d like to know who’d be interested in such a thing.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on
Dec 4, 2008 7:17 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes
I’d buy anything officially endorsed by this blog. Although I think it would be a little presumptive to put a “motto” on the shirt . . . we’re not the ones playing those snaps, nor are we the coaches. I’d rather have something officially endorsed by the team or the coaches, as a show of support. Dunno if that’s just a personal quibble.
In any case, there needs to be a pie a la bacon shirt at some point.
by wwcmrd? on
Dec 4, 2008 7:43 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Penalties
I’m curious to know what you guys think about the massive amount of penalty yards Georgia is giving up in games this year. It looks like they’re giving up about 74 yards per game. I know some other successful teams like USC, Oklahoma, Boise State, etc. also give up a lot of penalty yards, but to me, it just seems kind of uncharacteristic of Richt to be okay with that. (and didn’t he state something to that effect?) I looked at the three previous years for Georgia and they were averaging anywhere from the low 40s to the mid 50s. That’s a pretty significant jump in a year’s time. Just wondering if that might be symptomatic of the problems y’all are talking about as well?
by Nico2.0 on
Dec 4, 2008 2:28 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
That's a fair question
I believe it is symptomatic of the problems, in several ways. First of all, some penalties (e.g., pass interference) often are the result of being caught out of position and having no choice but to mug a guy who’s about to make a big play on you. Secondly—-and this, in my opinion, is the much larger problem—-some penalties indicate a major breakdown in discipline. I’m thinking here of the personal foul penalties, the absence of which was the lone defensive bright spot last Saturday.
Coach Richt has commented on it quite frequently, and it’s clear that guys are running stadium steps because of it, but, so far, it’s not working. Some penalties are the results of aggression, and don’t really hurt you. If a couple of offsides penalties are the price you pay for getting consistent pressure on the quarterback, I don’t mind them; if they’re just easy yards for the opposition with no payoff, they’re just dumb. We’ve certainly extended some drives with ill-timed penalties.
Part of it, of course, is the prevalence of youth, a condition made worse by injuries, but those are problems that ought to get better with experience. After we lost two starting left tackles and had to reshuffle an underclassman-laden line, I could forgive a holding penalty or two while guys got accustomed to their jobs. However, the offensive line has become more disciplined and made real progress; the same cannot be said for the defense on a consistent basis. That, to me, indicates a problem in coaching. I’m willing to be patient with growing pains as long as I’m seeing progress, but, when the situation gets worse rather than better, that’s cause for concern.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on
Dec 4, 2008 7:13 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We also got hosed a couple of times
See BS grounding call in the Tech game.
by fotodog on
Dec 4, 2008 8:27 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Penalties..
how many yards did we give up trying to prefect infamous directional KO? That is a coaching issue that has driven me crazy all year. Didn’t Walsh boom the ball in game 1 & 2 – WTF happened to that concept?
by JRL on
Dec 4, 2008 6:24 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs








