Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: NHL Free Agency Coverage: NHL Rumors, NHL Signings & Trades


spread the word

Week 14 BlogPoll Ballot Submitted

It’s official: 2008 stinks. More specifically, both the S.E.C. generally and Georgia specifically stink in 2008, and, frankly, if both the S.E.C. and Georgia are going to be down in the same year, well, to my way of thinking, that’s synonymous with the whole year stinking in toto.

Perhaps for the first time ever, being a member of the Southeastern Conference actively operated against a team’s prospects for being ranked in my top 25. At the end of the day, this is the BlogPoll ballot I cast, which remains open for revision through Wednesday morning, so I invite your critiques of the following:

RankTeamDelta
1 Oklahoma 2
2 Texas --
3 Florida 1
4 Texas Tech 1
5 Alabama 4
6 Penn State --
7 Southern Cal --
8 Utah --
9 Ohio State 1
10 Boise State 2
11 Georgia Tech 4
12 Cincinnati 2
13 Michigan State 3
14 Boston College 4
15 Oregon 6
16 Pittsburgh 4
17 Mississippi 7
18 TCU 4
19 Ball State 6
20 Missouri 7
21 Oklahoma State 12
22 Virginia Tech 4
23 North Carolina --
24 Georgia 13
25 Oregon State 8

Dropped Out: Florida State (#19).

Yes, Oklahoma (11-1) lost to Texas (11-1) head to head. The Sooners also annihilated Texas Tech (11-1) and the Red Raiders beat the Longhorns. Accordingly, the retort to everyone brandishing a "45-35" sign is: "39-33."

Texas beat Oklahoma, Missouri (9-3), and Oklahoma State (9-3), in that order of impressiveness. That is a weightier set of victories than that compiled by Texas Tech, which beat Texas, Oklahoma State, and Nebraska (8-4). However, the ‘Horns also assembled a resume less impressive than that put together by Oklahoma, which beat Texas Tech, Cincinnati (10-2), Texas Christian (10-2), Oklahoma State, and Nebraska. Thus, the Sooners are No. 1, the Longhorns are No. 2, and the Red Raiders are No. 4.

The only team able to keep the Big 12 South from locking up the top three spots on my ballot was Florida (11-1), which continued to make good on Tim Tebow’s teary-eyed promise to beat the crap out of everyone after the Gators’ increasingly forgivable loss to Ole Miss (8-4). Despite U.F.’s devalued wins over Georgia (9-3), Florida State (8-4), and Miami (7-5), the thoroughness with which the Saurians are dominating the opposition enabled them to inch up a notch.

Alabama (12-0) fell to fifth despite the Crimson Tide’s dominant performance against the Plainsmen because the team’s marquee win at Georgia looks increasingly meaningless, leaving as the only sparkling jewel in the Red Elephants’ crown a four-point home win over Mississippi.

Admittedly, that win’s looking better and better.

The sixth, seventh, and eighth spots on my ballot remained the property of Penn State (11-1), Southern California (10-1), and Utah (12-0) because their respective resumes remained unchanged. The Nittany Lions and the Utes had open dates and the Trojans faced Notre Dame (6-6), which has been the functional equivalent of a bye for most of the last decade and a half.

Ugly losses (and subsequent plummets) by the teams I had ranked ninth, eleventh, and 13th enabled Ohio State (10-2) and Boise State (12-0) to sneak upwards slightly and, after sitting out in the cold and rain for four hours on Saturday watching it all unfold, I had no choice but to rank Georgia Tech (9-3) eleventh, awarding the Yellow Jackets the ranking previously belonging to the ‘Dawgs. Yes, that makes me want to puke, too. We lost to a guy named Josh Nesbitt who kneels down so far under center that he looks like a duck being stuffed inside the turkey’s butt in preparation for the cooking of a turducken. If we were Japanese instead of Georgian, we’d have to kill ourselves with seppuku swords to restore the lost honor of our ancestors. Did I mention that 2008 stinks?

Incremental gains were made by Cincinnati, Michigan State (9-3), and Boston College (9-3), who remained in the same sequence relative to one another, and performances of varying degrees of impressiveness and significance allowed reasonably large leaps to be made by Oregon (9-3), Pittsburgh (8-3), Ole Miss, and Ball State (12-0). Due to a dearth of otherwise qualified teams, T.C.U. came along for the ride, landing at No. 18.

Nothing in the win over Duke posted by North Carolina (8-4) gave me cause to move the Tar Heels, who stayed parked at No. 23, and canings of various levels of severity and shame caused a substantial drop in the value of the stock of Missouri, Oklahoma State, Georgia, and Oregon State (8-4).

The Civil War, brought to you by "What Not to Wear."

That left me with 24 teams for 25 spots, so Virginia Tech (8-4) sneaked into the No. 22 slot, just ahead of the U.N.C. squad V.P.I. defeated. Yes, I know the Hokies lost to the selfsame Seminoles whom I dropped from the poll, but Frank Beamer’s bunch beat Georgia Tech and Nebraska in addition to the Tar Heels, whereas F.S.U.’s only other even vaguely impressive pelt was that of the Hurricanes.

I gave thought to ranking Northwestern (9-3), Iowa (8-4), Brigham Young (10-2), and Nebraska, who, respectively, are my de facto 26th through 29th teams.

I watched the Ball State-Western Michigan game on Tuesday and the Texas-Texas A&M game on Thursday. On Friday, I watched all of the Mississippi-Mississippi State and Arizona State-U.C.L.A. games and parts of the Pitt-West Virginia, Arkansas-Louisiana State, and Boise State-Fresno State games. On Saturday, I attended the Georgia-Georgia Tech game and was not thereafter tempted to watch any college football for the remainder of the day.

Let me know what about that ballot appears to you to be amiss or uncertain. I will happily answer any questions, address any constructive criticisms, and make appropriate adjustments if presented with sufficiently persuasive arguments.

Go ‘Dawgs!

0 recs | Comment 11 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Hahaha yeah I've noticed...

Nesbitt does look very funny squatting down so much. I don’t know if it’s seeing the shotgun so much or what, but I’ve never noticed a guy squatting so much to take a snap under center. That cannot be very comfortable.

by dpearson6 on Nov 30, 2008 11:35 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Seriously, he's waaaaay down low and way up under there

Obviously, the offense works, so I can’t criticize, but what’s the philosophy there? Is the theory that it allows the center to get the ball into the quarterback’s hands a split-second before the defense knows it’s been snapped, so it gives the blockers an extra instant to get going and the backfield an extra instant to get moving?

Once again, it works—-I can’t tell you how many plays on Saturday looked like they were stopped instantaneously yet actually picked up three or four yards—-so I can’t criticize, but it just looks weird. If I were Nesbitt, I’d make danged sure my center didn’t eat anything spicy before the game, I’ll tell you that!

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Dec 1, 2008 7:10 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Squatting quarterback?

Isn’t that characteristic of many “triple option” teams?

by Jujdog on Dec 1, 2008 11:44 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

holy damn

I literally just had a flashback of a Reshad Jones missed tackle.

by UgaBulldog14 on Dec 1, 2008 1:15 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I can answer that one . . .

the idea is that the linebackers can’t read his body lean and hands as well if he’s down behind the center coming off the ball. That way Jon Dwyer can get right up on you on the dive before you even know he has the ball. Or, you could just give it to Roddy Jones and watch Dannell Ellerbe and Reshad Jones considerately let him waltz by with only a cursory shoulder bump. Six of one, half a dozen of the other.

by MaconDawg on Dec 1, 2008 3:24 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am truly disappointed in you, Kyle...

You have let your sourness over the Dawgs loss Saturday cloud your judgement. No matter what has happened to Georgia this year, for a team to go UNDEFEATED in the SEC is a feat rarely done and should be acknowledged for the accomplishment it is. It’s bad enough to rank 4 teams with a loss ahead of Alabama, but when one of those teams, Texas Tech, did not just get beaten, but BLOWN OUT, that’s just ridiculous. Obviously, even you are swayed by “style” points. Defense doesn’t matter? Georgia sure needed more of it in the 2nd half Saturday.

"I hate everything orange"
It's all about Crimson - ROLL TIDE!!!

by bamavicki on Dec 1, 2008 7:50 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Defense matters a great deal

It also matters against whom you are defending.

The Crimson Tide’s wins over Clemson and Georgia simply are no longer as impressive as they appeared at the time. The narrow wins over Kentucky and L.S.U. are black marks against ‘Bama. A four-point home win over Ole Miss represents the most meaningful victory on Alabama’s resume.

Oklahoma, Texas, and Texas Tech have beaten Texas Tech, Oklahoma, and Texas, respectively. The Tide haven’t beaten anyone remotely that good. The Gators, as an S.E.C. team, are hampered by the fact that they have played in the league in a down year, but Florida has the better non-conference schedule and the Saurians have destroyed everyone they’ve faced since the Mississippi game. Comparisons of final scores against such common opponents as Georgia and L.S.U. do not reflect well on ‘Bama, despite the fact that the Tide won a close one over Ole Miss and the Gators lost a close one to Ole Miss. That’s not being swayed by style points, that’s appreciating the difference between kicking tail and scraping by.

Fortunately, Alabama has a golden opportunity to get back in my good graces on Saturday. If ’Bama beats the Gators—-and I have not yet decided whether I think that will happen—-the Tide will rise again.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Dec 1, 2008 8:56 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The point which you missed...

…is that a team does NOT belong in the top 5 in the nation if they are blown out by ANYBODY, even if it’s the #1 team in the nation. NO other poll has Texas Tech higher than #7.

"I hate everything orange"
It's all about Crimson - ROLL TIDE!!!

by bamavicki on Dec 2, 2008 1:42 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nitpickery re-run

Oklahoma State still has the same record as Missouri, still plays in the same conference, still beat them at their place, and still lost to better teams.

by drothgery on Dec 2, 2008 10:21 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This time, though . . .

. . . one of them is a division champion, and it ain’t the Pokes. Besides, it’s the Big 12; since when did head-to-head matter?

Seriously, though, I’ll revisit those two rankings this evening and see whether they hold up under closer scrutiny. Thanks for the feedback.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Dec 2, 2008 12:39 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I've looked at it again . . .

. . . and you’re right. I’ll be adjusting my ballot accordingly.

Thanks again.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Dec 2, 2008 8:39 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.
Start posting about the Bulldogs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Flowerchucker_small
Quick Question re: Branden Smith
Small
College Football Preview Luncheon
Photo_69_small
Individual/Composite calendars for iCal/Outlook?
Small
College Football Preview Luncheon
Small
muschamp recruits in georgia
Associated_20press_clayliston_1965_l_small
How to Taunt a Georgia Fan
Mtsu_sm_small
Going to UGA
Small
oklahoma state blog
Small
2009 Competition Improves
Small
100 Cocktails

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

Official Partner of CBS Sports