Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


spread the word

Don't Bet On It!: National Games of Interest

Because the ‘Dawgs are idle this Saturday (and, thus, there is no need for me to prepare an installment of Too Much Information), I have been able to take a more leisurely approach to this week’s posting schedule. For instance, I didn’t take you around the S.E.C. until Thursday morning, which means I didn’t get to the national games of interest before now. Had I done this earlier, though, I, uh, would have called Wednesday’s Ball State-Central Michigan showdown and Thursday’s Georgia Tech-Miami (Florida) matchup correctly. Really, I promise I would have.

The credibility of the preceding claim may or may not be bolstered by my 4-2 ledger in last week’s national picks, which improved my season-long record in non-S.E.C. predictions to a middling 37-30. Surely it goes without saying that such a prognosticating resume offers all the incentive you would ever need for following my regular recommendation: Don’t Bet On It!

Will Muschamp proving to be the finest hire of the 2008-’09 coaching carousel? You can bet on that!

Here are Saturday’s national games of note:

Pittsburgh at Cincinnati: This game presents a lot of unanswered questions. Will Brian Kelly’s apparent candidacy to take over at Tennessee distract the Bearcats? Is Dave Wannstedt really on the verge of leading the Panthers to a conference crown? Is this game being played in 2008 or in 2001? Before the season started, I voiced my doubts about Pitt and heeded the apparent wisdom of my brother-in-law, who advised me: "Every time someone ranks Pitt in their top 25, an angel loses its wings." The Mid-American Conference refugee ‘Cats, on the other hand, seem like the odd men out in a Big East otherwise made up of disappointments (Louisville, Rutgers, South Florida, and West Virginia), flukes (Connecticut and Pitt), and disasters (Syracuse). Cincinnati, by contrast, actually seems like a solid program, which is why I’m going with the Bearcats to keep their heads about them while the Panthers inevitably implode.

Brigham Young at Utah: I don’t know whether this year’s edition of the Holy War will be the best game money can buy, but there’s a good chance it will be the best game you won’t get to see. I don’t know that this is such a terrible thing, though, because the Utes clearly appear to be by far the best of the non-B.C.S. conference teams and the Cougars look like the most overrated of the potentially rankable mid-majors. I like Utah to take care of business at home in a game that won’t be particularly close.

When I note that B.Y.U. is the most overrated of the possibly top 25-worthy squads from outside the longstanding power conferences, I am even including the Hawaii Warriors of the Midwest, the Ball State Cardinals, who have played no one but at least have gone undefeated. (Associated Press photograph by Michael Conroy.)

Michigan State at Penn State: I have to give the Spartans credit; I keep waiting for them to collapse, and they haven’t done it yet. It would be more than a bit of a stretch to claim that a loss to the Nittany Lions in Happy Valley followed by a loss to, oh, say, Georgia in the Capital One Bowl would constitute a late-season fade, but, just the same, let’s give it a shot, shall we? Michigan State gets some semblance of a downturn underway with a loss to Penn State; we’ll see how the rest of it plays out come January 1.

Texas Tech at Oklahoma: I know it’s sacrilege for an active participant in the college football blogosphere to say so, but I don’t particularly care for Mike Leach. I respect him as a coach, and I have no basis for disliking the man personally, but he strikes me as being like those guys in high school who tried to be weird strictly for the sake of being able to brag about how weird they were. That’s the hit I get off of Coach Leach’s public fixation with pirates and his purposeful quirkiness. I don’t mind those attributes in a sportscaster or a blogger, but I don’t particularly need to see a Division I-A head coach let his freak flag fly solely so he can make a production out of celebrating how odd he is. It’s like he’s a sports talk radio host caught in a football coach’s body. To give credit where credit is due, though, Coach Leach has put together a complete team in Lubbock and is no longer entirely reliant upon soft scheduling and ludicrous aerial numbers for his success. Can he win on the road against a man who has done little of late to earn the nickname "Big Game Bob"? I’m not sure whether this has more to do with faith in Texas Tech or a lack of same in Oklahoma, but, either way, I’m going with the Red Raiders to cement their claim to the No. 1 ranking with a Norman conquest.

Those are my picks for tomorrow’s college football action on the national stage. Since my track record is what it is, the foregoing forecasts are for entertainment purposes only; no matter what your particular circumstances happen to be, you ought to take my weekly advice: Don’t Bet On It!

Coming Soon: National Game of Disinterest.

Go ‘Dawgs!

0 recs | Comment 8 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

There's only one correct answer for the game of disinterest

Seriously, there is an AWFUL game being played this week. Hopefully we’ll agree.

by UgaBulldog14 on Nov 21, 2008 10:02 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I won’t object to your dislike of Leach, every man is entitled to his opinion, but after covering this team and coach for quite some time, and blogging about them for over 2 years, I can assure you that it’s not an act. If it is an act, then he’s acting 24-7 and if that’s the case, you should like him for the schtick alone. In any event, I think the whole quirky-personality has snowballed since the NY Times article and writers have purposefully written about his eccentricities. Leach is a guy who enjoys history (he’s reading about Winston Churchill) and much like myself, he picks a subject and reads/studies until he’s finished.

If anything, I hope that you can appreciate what he’s done at a school with traditionally less talent than Texas or OU and it’s a little bit out of the way. I think we had to hire a guy who wasn’t conventional, and there was a very good chance that Leach could have been an absolute failure, because it is difficult to recruit to a place where there hasn’t been the history of Georgia, or of the aforementioned Longhorns or Sooners.

I had the pleasure of interviewing SI’s Austin Murphy and he had this to say about Leach and I thought it was very telling:

It sounds like you’ve spent quite a bit of time in Lubbock, in and around Captain Leach and the entire team. We’ve read plenty of stories about Leach’s quirky personality and the offense ahead of it’s time, what’s your draw to Lubbock, Texas Tech, and the Captain?

In 1999 I took a six month sabbatical from SI – I’d been covering the NFL – and moved my young family to Collegeville, Minn. We spent a season with a D-III program called St. John’s of Minnesota. My book about the experience is called The Sweet Season. The head coach there, John Gagliardi, has more wins than anyone in NCAA history – he’s in the mid-400s now, blew by Eddie Robinson a few years back.

The draw was how he won: with a list of 60-odd “No’s” – no blocking sleds, no whistles, no idiotic calisthenics that have no application to football. In short, this guy was a kind of football mystic, and had figured out a way to succeed complete outside the conventions and received wisdom of what I think remains one of our most hidebound and traditional sports. We’re all drawn to original thinkers, guys willing to stand by the courage of their convictions, and I think the foremost example now works in Lubbock. That’s the draw.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Nov 21, 2008 5:33 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thanks, Seth

I appreciate the reasonable defense of Mike Leach, about whom you obviously know more than I do (and with good reason). As I indicated above, I respect him as a coach, and I have no basis for disliking the man personally; the pirate thing, &c., comes across to me as gratuitously oddball, but I could be wrong. Since the blogosphere almost universally hails him for his uniqueness, though, I thought a dissenting voice deserved to be heard.

Obviously, there’s nothing wrong with his persona, whether it’s genuine or forced, and the man is a good coach who has built his program into a legitimate contender in a year in which his team competes in the tougher division of what clearly is the country’s toughest conference (at least for this year). Certainly, Coach Leach’s bucking of the conventional wisdom (e.g., the wide splits in his offensive line) recalls the different approach taken by Steve Spurrier when he took over in Gainesville, and the success of his approach is starting to be seen.

You likely are right that the conventional news media harp too much on the pirate angle, but something about it rubs me the wrong way. Anyway, he’s a good coach and I wish the Red Raiders luck tomorrow. Thanks for commenting . . . and good job on the Austin Murphy interview, by the way.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Nov 21, 2008 8:18 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fair enough.

I’m traveling to Norman this morning, it should be exciting. Thanks again for the compliments.

Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation

by Seth C on Nov 22, 2008 6:35 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Be careful who you're blaming...

I tend to agree that the coverage on Leach has now reached somewhat annoying levels, as his pirate “obsession” (I guess I’m obsessed with Vietnam, since I’ve been reading about it recently) is now lazy journalism topics whenever someone wants to throw together a story. It hasn’t always been like that.

But Leach has always been like this. We knew he was quirky years ago when he was doing the weather. That was years ago. I was reading an article about Graham Harrell’s recruitment today, and Leach was talking to Graham’s father about pirates… four years ago. And that wasn’t with the media listening in, Harrell was just recalling the incident because someone shoves a mic in his face.

The oddball stuff may be getting tired, but I have no reason to doubt Leach’s sincerity. I think he absotively posilutely believes the things he’s saying. And writers love it because it makes for easy print. And he’s candid (though not with his players, which rubs media the wrong way). Gameday this morning asked him what he thought about global warming, a hugely controversial topic, and succinctly Leach just says “Overstated.” Would anyone even ask another coach that kind of question? I’m rolling my eyes just thinking of the ways many coaches would dodge that one.

He was acting this way back when he was just an OC at Oklahoma, when no one cared who he was. If there’s someone to blame here for the way his persona has blown up, it’s the people covering him.

I hope he never changes, I love him. This is probably just a fan’s biased opinion, but I don’t think he is the least bit concerned with how people view him. I don’t think he wants to be seen as interesting or what have you, he just straight out calls things like he sees them, which makes him absolutely unique among CFB coaches, a profession notorious for doing precisely the opposite.

Go register. Or else.

by Skin Patrol on Nov 22, 2008 4:22 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

wow [i][u]Go DAWGS[/u][/i]

by HLFelkel on Nov 23, 2008 12:10 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's kind of late to comment on this, but...

… Cinci left the MAC in 1952. Wouldn’t CUSA refugee be a bit more accurate?

by drothgery on Nov 23, 2008 12:16 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fair enough

What I meant was that, to many college football fans outside the Midwest, Cincinnati seems like it’s still a mid-major, when, in fact, it’s a quality program in a B.C.S. conference.

In other words, I meant to say that the Bearcats don’t get the respect they deserve. I may not have made the point as well as I might have, and I certainly didn’t mean to deride them in the process. It seemed to me that the M.A.C. was the better way to say it—-that is, after all, the more natural non-B.C.S. conference fit—-but, yeah, it was a bit dated.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Nov 23, 2008 2:31 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.
Start posting about the Bulldogs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Flowerchucker_small
Quick Question re: Branden Smith
Small
College Football Preview Luncheon
Photo_69_small
Individual/Composite calendars for iCal/Outlook?
Small
College Football Preview Luncheon
Small
muschamp recruits in georgia
Associated_20press_clayliston_1965_l_small
How to Taunt a Georgia Fan
Mtsu_sm_small
Going to UGA
Small
oklahoma state blog
Small
2009 Competition Improves
Small
100 Cocktails

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

Official Partner of CBS Sports