Five Things Revisited: Auburn Edition.
Life is what happens while you're busy making other plans. So said John Lennon. He was right in that I had planned to post the Five Things Revisited last night. But life intervenes sometimes. But with it being an offweek, I don't think Tuesday is too late to look back at what was this weekend in Georgia football:
The screen game. I thought it would be one way for us to get around Auburn's strength on the front four. In fact, we used the screen game to A.J. Green for some nice gains, and completed one to Knowshon Moreno for his first career touchdown catch. I'm calling this one a correct prediction. I'm also thinking we'll see more of this against Georgia Tech, but more on that next week.
A Kodi Burns fumble. Indeed. Burns' fumble at the Georgia 24 in the second quarter came as the Tigers were driving and could have gone up by 2 touchdowns at home. This was a critical one in the grand scheme of things.
An Asher Allen interception. Wrong. Didn't happen. Again, this is why you don't want me picking out your lottery numbers.
A big play in the kicking game. Sometimes I just wish I was wrong. Coach Fabris says that a lot of our problem is that we're playing young guys and walk-ons on special teams. But Prince Miller and John Knox are neither at this point, and they were responsible for our biggest gaffs in the kicking game that didn't involve actually putting the ball in the air. I give Blair Walsh something of a pass on the kickoff that went out of bounds because of the winds in Auburn. The better question is why with the winds swirling and field position at a premium we were asking him to directional kick in the first place. Anybody got an answer for that one?
On the field goal attempt that was blocked, there was some pressure. Walsh however really should have gotten that kick up. It's been a while, but I remember as a kicker that when you're rushing to get the kick off, it's easy to impact the ball too high up, thereby creating a low trajectory. I remember this mainly because I once had an extra point blocked, then followed it up by rushing my next one and hitting our longsnapper right in the butt. Let's just say it was a low point. The larger point is that Walsh has been under fire for the past month or more, and it looks to me like the kid is rushing it a bit. But that's coming from a guy who was once a whisper away from castrating his snapper with a poorly kicked football. So take that for what it's worth.
Georgia 34, Alabama School of Remedial Tractor Repair 24. I said "The Aubies will get a big play on special teams and keep it close into the second half. But the Georgia offense just has too much firepower." While I got the number wrong, the general tenor of the prediction pretty much sums it up. We were a couple of plays in the kicking game away from a much more comfortable win, and Auburn was only a couple away from a big upset. So my record for the week looks like a pedestrian 3-2. It's not gonna get me in the BCS, but it beats Rich Rodriguez right now. A few random notes:
Some Auburn fans might try using this week to brush up on the "uncatchable ball" portion of Rule 9(c)(1). Some might also try not sounding like a bunch of petty little whiners. Penalties were not the difference in this game. Seriously. The rest of us are busy laughing at you, just like you laughed at the Georgia Bulldog fans who said the same thing two weeks ago after the Cocktail Party of Which We Do Not Speak. Waaahhhhhhh.
To those of you in orange and blue who instead owned up to the fact that your team played some of its best football in weeks, but ultimately came up a little short, bravo. That's a nice display of class. And to those Auburn fans who pointed to this performance as evidence that this team might be a lot better next year and hasn't given up on this one, triple bravo. Your optimism in the face of defeat exhibits what college football is all about.
This year we've beaten Tennessee and Auburn, survived Vandy and Kentucky teams which will almost certainly go bowling, and won our first true road test west of Baton Rouge in decades in front of a national TV audience. We are quietly in position to bring in one of the top 5 recruiting classes in the country, including arguably the top player in the state of Florida (a huge coup given that he is a mobile quarterback). Our losses came at the hands of, in my opinion, 2 of the top 4 teams in the country.
If we beat Georgia Tech, then play in and win the Capitol One Bowl, we have an excellent chance to finish in the top 5. And we would have done so without arguably our best defensive player (Jeff Owens), or our best offensive tackle (Trinton Sturdivant), but with a rag tag O-line full of freshmen and sophomores, and a freshman placekicker who's gone through an incredible slump on the road in coference play. Paul is correct, this is not what misery looks like, folks. I remember the period from 1993 to 1996, and the attendant 22-22-1 record. I remember losing at home to Southern Miss and thinking "same old, same old". That was misery.
This year is merely moderate disappointment. We've had one of the roughest schedules in the country, more serious injuries than I recall ever seeing, and youth and inexperience in all the wrong places. At this point, 10-2 with another win over Tech and heading to Orlando to play Ohio State in the Capitol One Bowl sounds pretty darned good to me. Winning the National Championship takes an obscenely fortuitous combination of talent, experience, and plain old luck. This year we didn't have it. Bobby Bowden coached at Florida State for 17 years before he had it. Mack Brown walked the sideline at Texas for 8 before things finally broke his way. The fact that Mark Richt may well have us in the top 5-8 teams in the country given what's transpired isn't evidence that he "doesn't have what it takes" to win it all. On the contrary, it's strong evidence that he does.
Matt Stafford is quietly within striking distance of his 63% preseason completion percentage goal (he's at 61% now) and will pass for over 3000 yards barring calamity. Knowshon Moreno is within shouting distance of 1500 yards rushing. While we've had stupifying redzone difficulties, the offense has not disappointed in terms of explosive yardage. I don't know if either will be back next year. But if they are, along with a more seasoned offensive line and A.J. Green on the edge, I like what our offense could accomplish. Perhaps they could do the defense a few more favors than they have this season.
I'll be back later to talk basketball, whether you like it or not. Until then . . .
Go 'Dawgs!!!
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
Auburn is a CIVIL ENGINEERING school.
IAs such it should be condemned as being akin to the North Avenue Nerds, and its agricultural heritage is more closely akin to South Campus at the Big U in Athens, Georgia. Please go easy on the references to tractor repair, as UGA is MUCH MORE of an agriculture school than is Auburn, who is contemplating dropping its ag school.
by Jujdog on
Nov 18, 2008 2:41 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
First off...
…when did having a Ag program make you in some way less of a school? I never understood how students of other schools or programs could dismiss the academic standings of a university by calling them a “Ag School”. Although I’m not a part of our school’s agricultural or livestock managing programs, I still respect many of those who are. I know many students within UGA’s Poultry Science (the nation’s number one school I might add) suffer from sleep depravation, due to the incredible work load they are put under.
Besides, these young men and women are charged with the feeding of our world’s ever growing population, and to consider them as somehow less intelligent or inferior to, let’s say, a business or law student is nothing short of elitist.
by Dawgb1 on
Nov 18, 2008 3:14 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually Jujdog. . .
my father and grandfather each took Ag. classes at the University. I attended my first game in Sanford Stadium on a day during which the University honored my grandfather for his service to agricultural education in the state of Georgia generally and at the University particularly. That was also the day Tommy Hodgson led LSU to victory in Sanford Stadium, but let’s not dwell on that part.
My main point is that Auburn is a school for remedial tractor repair. It does not conduct the type of high level agrogenomics research that takes place in Athens, many of which have as their aim increasing the standard of living and availability of high quality food around the world. Ag. Hill in Athens is definitely different from Auburn.
Heck, they even have to have a handy online calculator to teach their students how to calculate their own GPA’s. Though in point of fact Auburn is not just a civil engineering school.
by MaconDawg on
Nov 18, 2008 3:25 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
And Dawgb1 . . .
is right about the poultry science program. I’ve heard that one’s a real killer.
by MaconDawg on
Nov 18, 2008 3:27 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
John Knox
Is young…with baldwin and banks on the depth chart you would only recognize him from the g day game (if that).
Auburn is, in point of fact, where the wanna be gentry who can’t make it into a school with an admissions process go. It is also a city that might be the most boring college town ever.
Stu's Views
by StuGladney on
Nov 18, 2008 3:36 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Knox . . .
is a redshirt freshman, but 10 games into his redshirt freshman year is definitely too far along to be making those kind of mistakes. And I have to admit, the War Eagle Supper Club is not bad so far as college hangouts go. Other than that, yeah, Auburn is one step above Starkghanistan.
by MaconDawg on
Nov 18, 2008 5:26 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually, Macondawg
I never said that Auburn is JUST a civil engineering school and there has been considerable talk about discontinuing the Ag school. My son in law is an Auburn graduate with an Ag degree and I assure you his net worth would choke you. If you knew anything about tractors in today’s world, you would know that no remedial repair is possible as they are about as high tech as possible.
by Jujdog on
Nov 18, 2008 6:41 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Hyperbole- (noun)
Etymology:
Latin, from Greek hyperbolē excess, hyperbole, hyperbola, from hyperballein to exceed, from hyper- + ballein to throw — more at devil
Date:
15th century
: extravagant exaggeration (as "mile-high ice-cream cones")
by MaconDawg on
Nov 18, 2008 8:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In MaconDawg's defense . . .
. . . if the national government subsidized lawyers the way they subsidize farmers, all of our net worth would receive a considerable boost from the tax dollars we received for not practicing particular types of law we weren’t planning to practice, anyway!
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on
Nov 18, 2008 7:48 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Kyle
you don’t know what you are talking about with respect to agriculture. Give it a rest.
by Jujdog on
Nov 20, 2008 4:24 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Give what a rest?
Each week, MaconDawg outlines five things he expects to see in the following Saturday’s Georgia game. He revisits these five things early the following week to see how well or poorly he did. In the course of doing so, he makes jokes, including variations on the name of the Bulldogs’ opponent designed to play to popular stereotypes regarding that team, that school, or its fans.
These jokes invariably involve exaggerations and most often involve generalizations which would be unfair if they were offered seriously, which they plainly are not. Because MaconDawg clearly is engaged in good-natured kidding around, these are not jokes to which any reasonable reader could take offense. Ordinarily, even opposing fans know that he is kidding and respond in kind, with equally inaccurate yet equally inoffensive jokes about Georgia fans.
You seemed to take that more seriously than was warranted, and MaconDawg responded respectfully and reasonably. You replied by mentioning your son-in-law and describing the complexity of modern tractors. Because MaconDawg is a colleague and a friend, I felt the need to defend my co-author. Rather than be needlessly confrontational, I tried to disarm the situation with humor. Once again, I thought it was clear that I was kidding.
Obviously, I know the person to whom you are referring. While we do not see one another as often as either of us would like due to geographic distance and the fact that we both have professional and parental responsibilities which (quite properly) take up the bulk of our time, your son-in-law is someone I like and respect, and with whom I believe I have a good relationship. Despite our divergent football loyalties, I believe we are good-natured in our conversations about intercollegiate athletics and I am unaware of there ever having been a cross word or hurt feelings between us.
Beyond that, there is the fact that he is married to someone I love dearly, whom I regarded more as a sister than a cousin while we were growing up, who was a bridesmaid in my wedding, and who made a point of tossing the bouquet to my then-girlfriend (now wife) at her own reception. If my attempt at lightening the mood came across flat-footed and offended either you or anyone about whom we both care a great deal, I apologize. I believe you know me well enough to know that I am my mother’s son when it comes to my concern that I may, even inadvertently, have hurt the feelings of the people I love, particularly when they are family.
That said, I cannot in good conscience stand idly by and allow MaconDawg to be berated when he has done nothing wrong, so I make no apology for having tried to defend him, even if I did so poorly. Anytime anyone goes after MaconDawg unfairly, I am going to stand up for him. Anyone who goes after MaconDawg unfairly needs to be prepared to deal with that reality or needs to find a new weblog to frequent.
I do not believe I have ever claimed to know anything about agriculture, which no one but you seems interested in discussing, anyway. I certainly do not believe I have made even an allusion to agriculture, here or elsewhere, beyond the comment above (which had more to do with lawyers than with farmers in the first place), which is why I wonder why I am being told, “Give it a rest.” I have made one comment in response to two comments by you. To what, precisely, do I need to give a rest? At whom, exactly, is that admonition better directed, you or me?
I hope I am reading more into your comment than was intended; I hope you are being as glib as MaconDawg was being, but the statement that I don’t know what I’m talking about with respect to a subject utterly alien to the subject of this weblog or the subject MaconDawg was addressing came across as flippant to the point of being dismissive. I don’t believe I did anything to deserve that.
If there is more to this than meets the eye, I would respectfully request that the Biblical injunction about addressing disputes set forth in Matthew 18:15-18 be followed and that whatever fault has been found in me be addressed privately before being aired publicly. I genuinely do not know what provoked this particular comment thread, but I very much would like for it to end, preferably cordially.
I thank you in advance for taking this, and responding to it, in the spirit in which it was intended. On a more personal note, we hope to see y’all over the holidays.
Love,
Kyle
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on
Nov 20, 2008 5:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The "defense" of Macondawg has nothing to
do with your comments about government subsidies of farmers. For your information, the government does NOT pay farmers NOT to grow certain crops as your “defense” clearly indicated. That policy ended DECADES ago! Succinctly stated, the “it” you need to give a rest is your discussion of subsidies that you know nothing about. Stick to football.
by Jujdog on
Nov 21, 2008 2:40 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs








