5 Things Revisited: (Re)born on the Bayou Edition.
With the Mark Richt Victory Watch safely updated for another week, it's time to look back at the five things I said you'd see on Saturday when the Classic City Canines took on the Bayou Bengals from Baton Rouge:
A first half to remember: I had a feeling that the tenor for this one would be set early. But even I had no idea how early. Daryl Gamble's interception on the first play from scrimmage helped set the tone. But more important in my mind was the fact that Georgia was able to score touchdowns on its first two drives. And that after LSU cut the lead to 21-17, the defense responded with a pick and points (albeit a field goal) . That's the kind of counterpunch we will need next Saturday in Jacksonville. Because if you lay off the gas against the Gator offense, they'll pass your ass like Warren Wallace, son.
Warren Wallace: refers to himself in the third person, walks around looking like someone ran over his puppy, and points and stares at you. Have we checked to make sure this kid's birth certificate doesn't say "Meyer"?
30 Matt Stafford Passes (or more): I think that Stafford will find success against this defense. . . Coach Bobo will use the pass to set up the run. Ok, so Stafford only threw 26 passes. But wow were they effective. Stafford was 17 of 26 for 249 yards, 2 TD's and no interceptions. That equates to 9.6 yards per attempt, perilously close to the magic 10.0 per attempt average at which a quarterback's game goes from "very nice job, son" to "passable impersonation of Jason Bourne, covert assassin". In addition, he may or may not have autographed a picture for Gary Danielson after the game.
Charles Scott in the 4th quarter: As the old saying goes, "quick guys get tired, but big guys don't shrink." I'm a little worried about our thin defensive line corps if we need to get a stop late to get the ball back. Even if we have the lead late, LSU has shown an ability to get the ball down the field fairly quickly on the ground. Boy howdy, did they move the ball late on the ground.
Admitedly, we helped the Tigers out by tackling in a way that probably would have made Kevin Ramsey say "Dude, I know from bad tackling, and that's some bad tackling." Charles Scott had 56 rushing yards from the 4:00 mark of the third quarter on. Keiland Williams had 105 total yards in the fourth, including a 66 yard reception on which he literally ran by Rennie Curran. Substitute Jeff Demps and Chris Rainey and I imagine you'll see that play in every single quarter this coming Saturday.
The "Smash" route: If LSU is vulnerable anywhere on defense, it's at the corners. Bonus prediction: While A.J. Green and MoMass will get plenty of chances, look for at least three other wideouts to get a catch (I'm thinking principally of Mike Moore, Tavarres King and Kris Durham). Stafford torched the LSU corners early and often. Short outs, posts, everything but the bubble screen. I also note that the part of Tavarres King in my prediction was instead played by Kenneth Harris (who, frankly, I probably would have picked instead if I remembered that he wa still on the roster).
UGA 27, LSU 20. But as Kyle wisely pointed out in his prediction, LSU has its own flaws. The Tigers beat South Carolina by the same margin that we did. They looked just as bad (or worse) against Florida than we did against Alabama. . . I think that we have enough weapons to win, and LSU just enough warts to lose. Let's be realistic here: there was a lot in this one to worry about going forward. Atrocious tackling. Trouble stopping a big downhill runner. Missed open deep balls from Matt Stafford. Just enough penalties (7 for 59 yards) to keep things dicey. But if you'd told me before the game that we'd score 14 defensive points, I'd have said you were nuts. If you'd told me we would break 50 in Death Valley, I'd have said you were nuts and probably made some bet I would have lost. (HT: Hey Jenny Slater).
I really thought there was a viable chance for us to lose this game. And could you blame me? Coming in LSU had not lost a Saturday home game since 2003 (they had lost on Thursday, but that was probably some sort of divine retribution for playing an SEC home game on Thursday . . .). But this is definitely something to build on.
We're up to #6 in the BCS and will be playing a showcase game against the team that Herbie the Highlighted Lovebug proclaimed this weekend is still the best in the country. We match up very well against Florida for a variety of reasons I'll get to later this week, and after this game we play three teams who all look exceptionally beatable.
I don't think I'm overstating things when I say that this win has put some swagger back in the Bulldogs' step, and revived belief that, with a little luck and a lot of effort, this team could still do some very special things. That all starts againthis weekend in Jacksonville. Kyle and I will both be around this week to help get you ready for the Cocktail Party. Until later . . .
Go 'Dawgs!!!
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
It was a great game
I’m still a little concerned with our defense, we don’t seem to get enough pressure on the QB consistently and we don’t cover the pass very well. I’m hoping that the defense steps up big on Saturday and puts pressure on Tebow (I wouldn’t mind if he ended up getting injured either).
by AcworthDawg on
Oct 27, 2008 2:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought that we
got after the quarterback better on Saturday than we have against a quality opponent all season. I especially like how Justin Houston is coming along. This was one of those games where we got to the opponent’s QB enough. That is a good sign, I think, because my evaluation of LSU’s offensive line is that it’s a darn sight better than Florida’s.
But the tackling did give me a very uneasy feeling heading into Saturday. I could see Tebow reprising the role of Charles Scott in running for 50+ after contact.
by MaconDawg on
Oct 27, 2008 2:15 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't you want our best?!?
I doubt you’d ever hear any of us say “I wouldn’t mind if Stafford ended up getting injured either.” I want Stafford in there. I want Knoshawn & A.J. Green in there too. They are tremendous players and we have respect for each of them. We don’t hate them and wish for injury just because they are talented. Don’t get me wrong – we want to pound on all 3 of them…a lot, but want them to get back up and walk back to the huddle.
That’s a little bit bush league, and I hope it isn’t the shared sentiment of the Bulldog Nation…I believe Richt left that sort of midset behind for Mickey Andrews to continue.
by skigator93 on
Oct 27, 2008 4:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not at all....
I don’t want to hear your fans crying all year about how “if Tebow wasn’t hurt we would have won”. I want you to line up your best 11 against our best 11 and see who comes out on top.
I do however hope that Tebow is getting the crap knocked out of him on a regular basis though.
by RocketDawg on
Oct 27, 2008 4:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
More of a lesson for Meyers.
I personally think he cares more about running up scores than he does the health of his team. You can’t honestly say that you agree with leaving Tebow in some of the games this year for all 4 quarters.
by AcworthDawg on
Oct 27, 2008 4:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed, skigator93
While I suspect there are some Florida fans who would like to see Stafford injured, that contingent exists, but is not a majority, in every fan base.
For the sake of emphasis, I joked recently about wanting to see Stephen Garcia injured, although I clarified in a later comment that I didn’t really mean that; I just wanted him to tone it down a little until he had actually accomplished something.
I don’t want to see Tebow injured, for three reasons.
First of all, RocketDawg is right that too many Gator fans grumbled last year about Tebow’s shoulder. I want both teams at full strength so that whatever result is achieved is attained without any asterisks attached.
Secondly, Tebow is one of those players, like Moreno, whose on-field exuberance seems to be a genuine expression of a child-like love of the game. They’re special players whose joy is infectious and embodies what we all love most about the sport. As much as I want to see Tebow’s team lose every game, the fact is that he is, by all evidence, a fine upstanding young man who is a fitting role model. Like Danny Wuerffel before him, he’s not someone I can bring myself to dislike, even if he does wear a color combination that makes me want to puke.
Finally, and most importantly, I know I attach outsized significance to these contests, but the moment my fandom finds expression in the honest hope that a 20-year-old kid suffers a painful physical injury that could threaten his long-term livelihood is the moment I need to find a new obsession, because my values at that point will have become too skewed by something that ought to be about who can soar the highest rather than who can sink the lowest.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on
Oct 27, 2008 4:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Amen Kyle
Agreed on all points. As much as I wish Knoshawn would have attended college at his second choice (UF), I enjoy watching him play and take abslutely no offense at his exuberance on the field. He and Tebow both play at the highest college level – the same way we all did in Pop Warner or in the backyard. They have fun. It’s enjoyable to watch and it fires up their teammates.
Acworth Dawg – I disagree 100% with how long Meyer leaves Tebow in. I posted a thread on this issue over at Orangeandblue.com just this morning in the Kentucky game discussion. It is a bad habit that Meyer has, and I am not sure where it is rooted. I really don’t think it is a matter of wanting to humiliate an opponent because we have no hatred for Kentucky, they were way undermanned last weekend after being riddled with injuries, and we really didn’t need the starters after halftime.
It could be because we were coming off a BYE and he wanted some of the starters to get a few more live reps in before this weekend’s game. We scored a bunch of points off of blocks and turnovers, so the offensive numbers weren’t nearly as huge as the score would suggest. I am thankful that we didn’t have any late injuries because we need all our horses this weekend.
I am hoping that Manny Moody is ready to go (indications are that he should be). While none are the all-around back that Moreno is, it would at least give Martinez a little more to think about in preparing his D for all 4 of our RBs plus Tebow.
This is going to be a fun week.
by skigator93 on
Oct 27, 2008 5:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I will admit...
I don’t honestly want Tebow to get injured and that comment was not in good taste. At the same time, I do think that it will happen eventually to one of Meyer’s star players if he continues to play them like he does. I am glad to see that there are Florida fans that don’t agree with how Meyer plays his starters so long, it seems like most I see commenting on forums don’t think it is an issue.
Even coming off a BYE week I don’t think is a justifiable reason to leave starters in. I mean Tebow is last year’s Heisman trophy winner, does getting a few more reps in a glorified scrimage really mean that much? It also doesn’t explain why earlier this year he was throwing for the endzone at the end of games that were already decisively won.
by AcworthDawg on
Oct 28, 2008 6:05 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bye week
Coming off a BYE week is a justifiable reason for playing starters in the 3rd quarter of a blowout. You don’t want to head into the UGA game with your starters havnig played 2 quarters of football in the last 3 weeks.
Also, as long as the starters are in the game, you run the regular offense, otherwise, what’s the point? Tebow and his receivers don’t get any timing work when you hand the ball up the middle to your RB every play. That’s not even in our playbook.
Even when the backups come in, there is nothing wrong with throwing the ball if that is your offense. The goal is to get your players some experience, which means running your offense. Losers complain about running up the score. You will never hear this Gator complain about anyone running up the score against my team. It is our defense’s job to stop you.
by skigator93 on
Oct 28, 2008 10:27 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Guess we'll just have to disagree
I just don’t see much of a difference in your starters playing 2 quarters or 3 quarters in a blowout. Does that extra quarter really make much of a difference? There is a reason these guys are your starters and it isn’t because they need more practice. They should be your most solid players on the team and 9 minutes of additional play time isn’t going to change that.
I would think that being up 49-3 with less than 10 seconds expired in the 3rd quarter would give your backups much more worthwhile play experience than for your starters. How about the fact that the Gators were running on 4th and 1 within field goal range during the 3rd quarter against Kentucky (twice in the same drive). I suppose your kicker really doesn’t need any practice.
by AcworthDawg on
Oct 28, 2008 4:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There is a difference between practice and live game action
I say yes, playing the 3rd quarter gives the starters exactly 50% more live snaps and plays than playing 2 quarters.
You really aren’t suggesting that we were trying to run up the score on Kentucky are you? I think the scoreboard could have been flipped if that were the case. Remember that we might have been undefeated right now if we had converted a 4th a 1 play. Maybe we were trying to practice that type of situation.
by skigator93 on
Oct 28, 2008 6:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey guys,
Just wanted to congratulate y’all on the win. We made too many mistakes on offense and didn’t make enough plays on D to balance it out. Y’all really took advantage of our blitzes and I think that was the difference in the game.
Florida is going to be tough for y’all to beat, but hopefully you guys can pull it out. Make me proud and make Tebow cry.
by LSU Jonno on
Oct 28, 2008 5:39 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs









