Week Seven BlogPoll Ballot Revised
As all of you are aware, one of the premises underlying the BlogPoll is that bloggers engage in more back-and-forth communication about the rankings in their chosen medium than voters in the sportswriters’ and coaches’ polls are apt to do---there’s a reason why they don’t call it "the reportersphere"---so there is greater likelihood of a particularly persuasive case having an impact. At its finest, meritocracy, rather than The Narrative, rules. As BlogPoll founder Brian Cook put it:
It's really important that you as a voter listen to the other voters in the roundtable discussions and the like. If someone provides a convincing argument about a team, please be open minded enough to admit wrongness and change your ballot. What's convincing? Well, that's up to you. Feedback and the give-and-take of blogging is critical to the poll. Be a part of the discussion, and change your mind.
I already had been giving some thought to making adjustments to my BlogPoll ballot, albeit not the demotion of North Carolina recommended by the exceptionally well-named Quiet Hour Backflips and implicitly endorsed by California Golden Blogs.
No, I was reconsidering my decision to rank Louisiana State ahead of Texas Christian. Here were the data that gave me pause:
- The Fighting Tigers went on the road and lost to highly-ranked Florida (5-1) by 30 points. The Horned Frogs went on the road and lost to highly-ranked Oklahoma (5-1) by 25 points. That’s effectively a push.
- One of L.S.U.’s wins was over Division I-AA Appalachian State. One of T.C.U.’s wins was over Division I-AA Stephen F. Austin. Those wins are essentially meaningless.
- Aside from the aforementioned outings, Louisiana State’s resume consists of wins over Auburn (4-3), Mississippi State (2-4), and North Texas (0-6), whereas Texas Christian’s record includes victories over Colorado State (3-3), New Mexico (3-4), San Diego State (1-5), Southern Methodist (1-6), and Stanford (4-3). One of the Bayou Bengals’ wins came on the road by a narrow margin; three of the Horned Frogs’ wins came on the road and none were close contests.
- For me, it came down to a question whether a 26-21 win over the Plainsmen in the so-called Loveliest Village counted for more or less than a 31-14 home win over a Cardinal club with an identical record. Stanford boasts wins over Arizona and Oregon State. Auburn beat . . . uh . . . Mississippi State by one? Tennessee by two? I hate to say it, but hasn’t more been accomplished at The Farm than at The Barn this season?

That settled it, then; I had decided to move L.S.U. down and T.C.U. up . . . and then I noticed that The Daily Gopher was sending readers my way for the purpose of making the following case for Minnesota:
As far as Minnesota is concerned I have no problem with my current ranking of the Gophers. I realize there is a lot of discussion surrounding their lack of a difficult schedule. But take a look at some of the other teams above or near the Gophers in the most recent AP/Coaches' polls and their strength of schedule ranking...
- Minnesota – 77
- Ball State – 107
- TCU – 91
- Tulsa – 141
- Florida State – 127
- BYU – 121
- Missouri – 87
- Texas Tech – 105
- Kansas – 95
- Georgia Tech – 89
Why do teams like Ball State, BYU, TCU or Texas Tech get ranked as high as they do despite a worse strength of schedule? I know the Big Ten is down but does it actually deserve less respect than MAC or Mountain West? BYU is the eithg [sic.] best team in the country with a SOS ranking of 121?
Minnesota earned a significant win on the road against a good team. Their strength of schedule is not in the top 30, but they are winning their games and deserve a top 25 ranking as much as any of the other teams in the 20-27 range.
Admittedly, I have an innate partiality towards arguments which treat Georgia Tech disrespectfully, but, when a fellow makes a good case in a civil manner---particularly when he’s a Big Ten blogger, in light of the squabbles I have had occasionally with fans of that league’s teams---he gets my vote.
Accordingly, here is my revised top 25:
![]() | ||
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama | -- |
| 2 | Texas | 3 |
| 3 | Oklahoma State | 11 |
| 4 | Penn State | -- |
| 5 | Boise State | 2 |
| 6 | Texas Tech | 4 |
| 7 | Southern Cal | 4 |
| 8 | Oklahoma | 6 |
| 9 | California | 7 |
| 10 | Michigan State | 12 |
| 11 | Florida | 8 |
| 12 | Ohio State | 1 |
| 13 | Virginia Tech | 1 |
| 14 | North Carolina | 11 |
| 15 | Georgia | 2 |
| 16 | Pittsburgh | 7 |
| 17 | South Florida | 7 |
| 18 | Vanderbilt | 12 |
| 19 | Wake Forest | 1 |
| 20 | Missouri | 17 |
| 21 | Ball State | 5 |
| 22 | Utah | 13 |
| 23 | Kansas | 3 |
| 24 | TCU | 2 |
| 25 | Minnesota | 1 |
Go ‘Dawgs!
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Moving LSU out. That's pretty bold.
You better hope you don’t get an “award” this week.
Seriously, though, I think you might be right. LSU has really proved nothing this year. I’m keeping them on for another week, but we’ll see how they do against South Carolina.
I’m so torn. Kind words for Stanford, yet kicking LSU to the curb. It’s like you gave a brand new Lexus to my aunt, then hit my mom with a tire iron.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Oct 16, 2008 5:36 PM EDT reply actions
Don't worry . . .
. . . if L.S.U. beats South Carolina this weekend, the Bayou Bengals will be given a huge boost.
It wouldn’t hurt them if Auburn and North Texas started winning games, either.
Go 'Dawgs!

by 
3
6 















