Hip Check
Last weekend, for what I believe was the first time in my life, I was described as "hip."
This compliment, though much appreciated, was curious, considering that it was paid to me after my admission that I let my son listen to a song recorded by a band that met a tragic end in a plane crash 30 years ago.
Still, since the subject has been raised, here is your opportunity to demonstrate the extent to which you are up to date on the lingo by taking the following matching quiz:
- Interactive gaming system
- Female golfing phenom
- Women's television network
- Ersatz-European men's magazine
a. Oui
b. We
c. Wie
d. Wii
If you only answered No. 4 correctly, you ceased to be hip approximately in the early 1980s. If you answered Nos. 3 and 4 correctly, you ceased to be hip approximately in the mid-1990s. If you answered Nos. 2, 3, and 4 correctly, you ceased to be hip approximately at the turn of the millennium. Finally, if you answered all four correctly, you are so hip as to be unintelligible to the rest of us, even when you're speaking sentences rather than text-messaging.
You may safely count me among the ranks of the unhip. I completely don't get the whole Wii thing. If you want to sit there and play Xbox or PlayStation, fine . . . but if a gaming system appeals to you because you can hold a gamepiece in your hand, go through the physical motion of rolling a bowling ball, and thereby simulate bowling, you need to get up off the couch and go bowling.
I also don't get the whole TiVo thing. I have a modicum of self-discipline, a smidgen of patience, healthy doses of punctuality and forethought, and a V.C.R. with a timer. Why would I possibly need a TiVo?
Finally, someone needs to explain text-messaging to me. You have a cell phone. You want to carry on a conversation with someone in real time. Call them!
Now that I am veering dangerously close to Andy Rooney territory, please permit me to conclude with the Unhip Thought for the Day, which is a quotation from my old friend and former "Dawg Show" co-host, Travis Rice: "I have no interest in owning a cell phone that takes pictures, but I might be interested in owning a camera that I can use to call people."
Go 'Dawgs!
0 recs |
16
comments
Comments
TiVo
Asking the difference between a VCR and TiVo is like asking what the difference is between a Ford Focus and a Lexus SC430. Sure, they both serve the same basic functions, but you get so much more with TiVo. The interface of the TiVo (or any DVR for that matter) is much more technical, but is still easy to use. And, when your TV suggests something you might want to watch, a bond grows that VCR's can't provide.
by imarealist on Feb 8, 2007 8:23 AM EST 0 recs
That's a good analogy, Realist
I, on the other hand, see it differently. I drive a Saturn. It is unspectacular but highly reliable, which is all I want from a vehicle. I view my car not as a status symbol but as a mere conveyance, a means to an end rather than an end unto itself. The swiftness with which an automobile's value depreciates is stunning in comparison to any other expensive consumer good, so I cannot justify spending more money than necessary on a car, which, after all, is just a car.
I grant that TiVo offers more features; I just don't need any of them. I recall distinctly the first time I watched a football game at the home of a friend who had a D.V.R. My reaction was 20 per cent "Hey, cool, new technology!" and 80 per cent "Will you put the remote down and let me watch the dadgum game?!?!"
In order to show me the features of his D.V.R., my host often said, "Let's replay that last play!" He backed up the action on the screen and replayed it in slow motion, then he zipped ahead past the replay run by the network broadcasting the game so that we could get back to real time viewing. I thought to myself, "Why didn't we just watch the C.B.S. replay in the first place?"
I didn't get it and it became genuinely annoying when I just wanted to have a perfectly ordinary game-viewing experience. It struck me as nothing more than a novelty, like 3-D movies; they're cool when they're new, but, after a while, it hits you that you're sitting in a movie theatre wearing cellophane glasses.
I don't fault those who like D.V.R.s; I see their utility for folks with such inclinations. For me and my house, though, I don't need those features . . . and I certainly don't need a mechanical device offering suggestions as to programming I might like. The last thing I need is the recommendation that I watch more T.V. and there's a bit of a freaky-deaky "2001: A Space Odyssey" vibe underlying the notion of a machine offering opinions regarding my well-being.
by T Kyle King on
Feb 8, 2007 8:02 PM EST
up
0 recs
A Saturn?
Getting back to TiVo... I actually use it to watch less TV. You see television shows usually contain about fifteen to twenty minutes of mind-numbing commercials. With my DVR, you can actually start viewing the television show about fifteen minutes into it, fast-forward through all of the commercials, and end the show at the exact same time. You've essentially shortened an hour-long program into 45 minutes, and condensed the fifteen minutes of commercial viewing for some other valued (or not) purpose. You can also watch something else (even a recorded show) while you are recording something else, a task that would require at least two VCR's running simultaneously.
But, a man that is satisfied is a man that can't be convinced. So, if you are satisfied with your VHS recordings, then who am I to argue?
by imarealist on
Feb 9, 2007 3:42 PM EST
up
0 recs
At 28...
by Todd on Feb 8, 2007 3:27 PM EST 0 recs
Texting
Don't get me wrong, I am for curmudgeonism where applicable. These kids and their tatoos!
by smq on
Feb 8, 2007 6:55 PM EST
up
0 recs
Todd, you make a good point
Most folks, though, don't need it. Lawyers who are in courtrooms most of the time may need to use text-messaging frequently. The number of people who need that capability is far, far lower than the number of people who think they need it, though.
Text-messaging, like the internet, has enormous potential utility that often is squandered in practice, as I suspect most text-messaging is of the hey-man-what-you-doing/nothing-man-what-you-doing/nothing-man variety.
SMQ makes a legitimate point, as well. As someone with a background both in persuasive writing and in public speaking, I see the benefits of both. I agree with Thomas Jefferson that the president's state of the union message should be delivered to Congress in writing, rather than verbally, because writing is the method of communication most conducive to the sorts of deliberations our Constitutional structure demands of the first branch of government.
However, e-mail is nowhere near as conducive to clear communication as a phone call. Tone, inflection, humor, sarcasm, and the like all get lost in e-mails, which constantly are a source of misunderstanding unless they are boiled down to their bare essence to an extent that robs them of all personality. I would rather hear someone emote than see someone's emoticons.
I have never either sent or received a text message, but, given the shorthand argot in which such communication takes place, I cannot imagine that it is an effective mechanism for real communication to anything like the degree of a genuine human conversation, in which we actually listen to one another.
Just as there will never be a compilation of correspondence made over e-mail that compares to the collections of letters between, say, Shelby Foote and Walker Percy or Maxwell Perkins and Thomas Wolfe, there likewise will never be an Algonquin Round Table of text-messaging.
Lengthy discourses such as those at SMQ's and my respective weblogs certainly are more effective in print than they would be as stemwinding speeches, but not all written communication is inherently superior to all verbal communication, and I suspect text-messaging to be the worst of the worst . . . worse even than e-mail, if such a thing is even conceivable.
by T Kyle King on
Feb 8, 2007 8:25 PM EST
up
0 recs
I'm with you on people who use it just for kicks..
by Todd on
Feb 9, 2007 11:53 AM EST
up
0 recs
Very good!
I served on the Student Judiciary from 1989 to 1993, including a stint as chief justice in 1991.
You didn't happen to pass through O.J.P., as well, did you?
by T Kyle King on
Feb 9, 2007 8:52 PM EST
up
0 recs
Yep.
It seems likely we have some overlapping acquaintances -- two to three degrees at the most.
by NCT on
Feb 9, 2007 10:34 PM EST
up
0 recs
Agree with Realist
And texting is great for bars - or the entire city of New Orleas - where it's impossible to hear on your phone.
by CW on Feb 8, 2007 7:59 PM EST 0 recs
I've had that technology for over 20 years
But, again, I have a V.C.R. with a timer. If I want to tape a show and watch it later, I already have that capability.
In fact, I can set my V.C.R. to record on a one-time, daily, or weekly basis, so it's no problem to record the same show every time.
Also, I don't have to wipe the memory periodically to make room to store more shows, the way I would with a D.V.R. When a V.H.S. tape gets full, I just pop in a new tape and I can keep the old tape to watch again and again.
by T Kyle King on
Feb 8, 2007 8:07 PM EST
up
0 recs
It seems you won't be persuaded
Yes, you can set a VCR (if you wish) to record the same time slot weekly. But TiVo will (if you wish) grab an entire season of your favorite show, skipping the reruns (if you wish). Even if the show changes time slots, TiVo will find it. And there's no changing tapes or fast-forwarding to find the program you recorded.
Except for important live events (like Georgia's away games), I have torn myself entirely away from the network's scheduling. I can watch My Name is Earl, skipping commercials, while my machine is recording Scrubs, so I can skip those commercials when I feel like watching it.
I've found that TiVo doesn't do that good of a job with its recording of "suggestions" for me. But I love old movies. If I get into a Jimmy Stewart or Hitchcock or DeNiro or Grace Kelly or Robert Mitchum mood, I can "tell" TiVo to go get all the movies with each of those folks, wherever they are "airing". I don't have to study TV listings and set a VCR to catch some TCM movie at 3 am. It's done for me.
With Georgia away games, this past season I made myself start watching them 10-15 minutes late so I could skip through commercials for a while. Add to that the pauses for bathroom or snack breaks, and it works out pretty good. And pauses and replays are not bad at all when you're the one holding the remote.
My brother and sister-in-law find it's great for storing up lots of Dora the Explorers and Clifford the Big Red Dogs and whatever that octopus's name is for my 5 and 3 year old nieces. HRH the elder sister is a whiz with that TiVo remote. (I have to add that television is not used as a full-time babysitter in their home, but it's nice for breaks when supper's being prepared.)
Jeez, Kyle, my parents (70 and 69) have TiVo and use it all the time (it was a gift from their sons a while back). And realize that I grew up in the last family in town to get a VCR, microwave oven, and touchtone phone.
[When I was a kid, dialing the last 5 digits of a number was sufficient. When we had to start dialing the extension, too, it was a big help to press buttons when every number began with TUxedo (88).]
But I'm 100% with you on the whole text-messaging thing. I won't type with my thumbs.
by NCT on
Feb 9, 2007 9:02 AM EST
up
0 recs
Aargh!
by NCT on
Feb 9, 2007 9:04 AM EST
up
0 recs
Voice from the past............
On the subject of textpagers and Tivo, I remember back in the early 90's when, sitting in the D/A's office in the Academic Building of the finest institution of higher learning in the land, you practically slit your wrists and swore you would never use a computer. You used some of this same logic to support your continued use of the typewriter. Hmmmmmmmm
When I left my job back in 2001, the thing I missed the most was my textpager. It saves time on long phonecalls and makes what you are saying very clear. Having said that, I don't have one now, nor would I use my own money to pay for one. I don't have Tivo as I rarely have need to record anything anymore, and we don't need one more thing to have to pay for monthly, but I promise you, if you would use it, you would love it. You know change is harder for some than for others.
Also, you are one of the hippest white guys to ever drive a Saturn, and I am one of the hippest white girls ever to drive a Mitsubishi Eclipse
Have you figured out who this is yet?
by gadwaggrl on Feb 9, 2007 7:40 PM EST 0 recs
Beth, you knew I knew it was you
by T Kyle King on
Feb 9, 2007 7:44 PM EST
up
0 recs







