A Novel Solution to Georgia's 2007 Scheduling Problem

As reported by Paul Westerdawg, Georgia is no closer to filling the vacancy in the Bulldogs' 2007 schedule.

The Beavers will not, in fact, be coming to the Classic City. (Photograph from Scout.com.)

Writes Josh Kendall:

The Bulldogs came close to signing a three-game deal with Oregon State that would have filled next year's vacancy, but the Beavers backed out of the deal two weeks ago. . . .

Georgia has enlisted the help of ESPN in finding a game. The network is making calls on behalf of the Bulldogs and trying to put together an attractive television matchup. . . .

[Georgia athletic director Damon] Evans has talked to both Notre Dame and Michigan about future matchups within the last two months, but both schools declined to enter into discussions.


Regarding the latter point, I am pleased to learn that Damon Evans is true to his word. I would encourage Maize and Blue fans to impress upon their athletic director the benefits of a Georgia-Michigan series and urge Fighting Irish fans to keep pushing for a Georgia-Notre Dame series, as well, as both intersectional matchups would be well worth watching.

In the meantime, though, September 1, 2007, is only 336 days away and the pickings already were getting slim when we confronted this issue last January.

At that time, 21 Division I-A teams were available on that date, including Clemson, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Pittsburgh, Rutgers, Texas, Texas A&M, U.C.L.A., and Wisconsin. Although many schools have not yet formally released their 2007 slates, several of those windows of opportunity undoubtedly have closed in the intervening nine months.

The preceding mention of the State University of New Jersey obligates me to include a photograph of Rutgers alumna Kristin Davis. (Photograph from Star Pulse.)

However, Kendall's Dawg Post article notes this additional datum:

Auburn also still is searching for a 12th game next season.

"That makes me feel better," Evans said.


One of Paul Westerdawg's readers has suggested playing Auburn twice, but that may be overthinking the problem. If the Bulldogs are available and the Tigers are available, why not move the Deep South's oldest football rivalry to the start of the season and fill the gap later in the autumn?

Since Auburn is having the same problems as Georgia, let's let that be the marquee attention-getting season-opening showdown and let's fit in another non-conference opponent later in the campaign.

Beat the Christmas rush . . . hate Auburn early.

No rule requires Georgia and Auburn to play in November. In fact, the Bulldogs haven't played the Plainsmen in their traditional spot on the slate in many years. Between 1892 and 1914, the Tigers were the final opponent on the Red and Black's schedule 18 times in 23 seasons.

It was not until the mid-1950s that the 'Dawgs got into the habit of ending the autumn by running their "Hate Season" gauntlet of Florida, Auburn, and Georgia Tech on an annual basis and, beginning in 1996, the Classic City Canines have had another opponent---either Ole Miss or Kentucky---included among those three.

Since we have not observed any ironclad practice regarding the timing of the Auburn game, let's look at opening the season against the War Eagle next Labor Day weekend and finding out what teams might be available later in the year. If September 1 is bad for everyone we might want to play, let's be accommodating and try something new.

Go 'Dawgs!

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Dawg Sports

You must be a member of Dawg Sports to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Dawg Sports. You should read them.

Join Dawg Sports

You must be a member of Dawg Sports to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Dawg Sports. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker